Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Nanopatterns Improve Thin-Film Solar Cells

Thin-film silicon solar cells are more efficient with tiny holes in the back electrical contact.

By Kate Greene

Monday, October 19, 2009

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Any given solar-cell technology has drawbacks and advantages. Thin-film solar cells, for instance, require less material than traditional solar cells, and are therefore cheaper, lighter, and flexible. And if those thin films are made with amorphous silicon, the cost is further reduced. The problem, however, is that thin-film solar cells made of amorphous silicon tend to have extremely low efficiencies compared to thicker, crystalline silicon photovoltaics.

Rainbow response: The absorption of light with a wavelength of 660 nanometers is greatest for the spacing and diameter of the holes in the dark-red portion of this graphic. The inset shows the layout of the cell.
Credit: Harry Atwater

But now, research from Caltech shows that it's possible to increase the efficiency of thin-film amorphous silicon cells 37 percent--from 4.5 percent efficiency to 6.5 percent, which is still significantly lower than commercial crystalline silicon cells that achieve efficiencies of more than 30 percent--by simply adding a pattern of nanoscale holes to the electrical contact on the back side of cells. Importantly, the research, led by Harry Atwater, professor of applied physics and materials science at Caltech, appears to be practical for scaling up to large-scale production of the cells.

A number of researchers and startups are exploring thin-film solar cells made of nonsilicon materials. But, says Atwater, these materials are relatively rare, and as such, they aren't practical for widespread use. "These represent challenges at extremely large scale," he says.

Silicon has the great advantage of being abundant and of having a long history in the manufacturing of electronics. But as a thin solar cell, silicon is less than ideal. There is a mismatch between the distance it takes for photons to be absorbed in silicon and the distance traveled by electrons that produce electrical current. Essentially, electrons knocked out of position by photons tend to spring back to their spots before they can be collected, resulting in low efficiencies in converting sunlight to electricity. But, if the optical absorption can be improved, then more electrons overall can be collected, increasing efficiencies.

Story continues below

Researchers and companies are exploring various options for improving efficiencies in such cells. For example, StarSolar, an MIT spinoff in Cambridge, MA, is exploring photonic crystals, structures that reflect light many times within the solar cell to increase the chance it has to produce electrical current. But so far, the approach appears to be difficult to scale up.

Atwater's approach targets the back side of the solar cell, the metal electrical contact that sits below layers of "active" silicon material where photons are absorbed. Instead of using a grating to produce multiple internal reflections, he's using an array of holes 225 nanometers in diameter. When light hits metal with an array of holes at this scale, some interesting physics occurs. The energy from the light is essentially trapped onto the two-dimensional wave on the surface of the metal. The electrons in these surface waves, called plasmons, are easier to use for generating an electrical current than those in silicon, which quickly snap back into place.

Comments

  • There's a useful bit of info not being made quite visible enough, then.
    Specifically, what portion of the total energy produced by a silicon PV cell backed by a nanopatterned electrode is actually resulting from the plasmonic mechanism -- because what it almost sounded like is that the plasmonic approach doesn't exactly really need silicon in front of it, and in terms of tweaking the conductivity and transmission/absorption characteristics to give the best plasmonic "reception", a range of other materials might improve matters. Granted, stacking multiple energy conversion processes on top of each other would seem to squeeze every possible erg out of each incident photon, but multi-factor economic break-point curve analysis doesn't reliably lend itself to "gut feel".

    If a thin-film plastic membrane with a nano-patterned electrode backing can be produced significantly less expensively than the equivalent surface-area of thin-film silicon PV cells, then that 43%-as-efficient conversion rate becomes economically meaningful and may be a worthwhile target for development.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    flared0ne
    10/19/2009
    Posts:40
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • Nanopatterns know by another name
    By developing 3D patterns sometimes referred to
    as holographic patterns or lensing to the resonant
    frequencies of the photons increases the efficiency of the PV cell.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    holoman
    10/19/2009
    Posts:24
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
  • another great contribution
    all points to advancements toward very inexpensive, durable and compact PV. check out: http://www.solarnetwork.net/ for an open-source application that could leverage these advancements.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    jwgorman
    11/19/2009
    Posts:15
    Avg Rating:
    4/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Making 3D Maps on the Move
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.