Traveling between cities by high-speed rail uses as much as a third less energy per passenger-mile than the same trip by car. The United States currently has just one high-speed line--a 735-kilometer system serving Boston, New York City, and Washington, DC. The Obama administration is investing $8 billion to jump-start the development of 10 high-speed rail lines around the country, but no firm date for construction has been set. Meanwhile, Europe is planning a significant expansion of its high-speed rail network: 8,000 kilometers are due to be added in Spain alone by 2020. Most ambitious of all is China, which announced in September that it plans to construct 42 high-speed lines, totaling 13,000 kilometers, by 2012.
Comments
g.strasorier...
10/28/2009
Posts:1
cloudmaster1...
11/02/2009
Posts:3
You forgot the pioneers of high speed rail: Japan!
Japan has a big HSR infrastructure that wasn't mentioned!
Would you correct this in the near future?
tiagoveloso5...
11/23/2009
Posts:1
Adjacent cities with large joint commerce can benefit from these high speed train systems, because and hour plane flight with the time to get to and from the airport & check in is often roughly equal to a 4 hour train trip.
Unfortunately, due to poor politics I foresee the local government restricting or moving high speed lines into areas were they least accessible. Hence the old conundrum, give the money to government and they waste it, give to business and they spend it wisely.
Dr. Brian Glassman
Ph.D in Innovation Management from Purdue University
briang1621
11/26/2009
Posts:121