Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Cheaper Solar Thermal Power

A simpler design could reduce the cost of solar power generated by concentrating sunlight on Stirling engines.

By Kevin Bullis

Tuesday, July 28, 2009

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Stirling Energy Systems (SES), based in Phoenix, has decreased the complexity and cost of its technology for converting the heat in sunlight into electricity, allowing for high-volume production. It will begin building very large solar-power plants using its equipment as soon as next year.

Sun catchers: This is the latest design of a system for focusing sunlight on a Stirling engine to generate electricity.
Credit: Sandia National Laboratories/Randy Montoya

The company is currently building a 1.5-megawatt, 60-unit demonstration plant that will use the company's latest design. Stirling expects to finish that project by the end of the year. It also has contracts with two California utilities to supply a total of 800 megawatts of solar power in Southern California. The first of the plants that will supply this power could be built starting the middle of next year, pending government permits and loan guarantees from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE).

The projects are part of a resurgence in what's known as solar thermal power. Various solar thermal technologies were developed starting in the 1970s, but a breakdown in government funding and incentives caused them to stall before they reached a scale of production large enough to drive down costs and allow them to compete with conventional sources of electricity. "It was a classic problem with solar. The market support to bring solar to high volume wasn't there," says Ian Simington, the chairman of SES and chief executive of the solar division of NTR, a company based in Dublin, Ireland, that bought a controlling share of SES last year.

Recent state mandates and incentives for renewable energy have led to a new push to commercialize the technology. There are over six gigawatts of concentrated solar power under contract in the southwestern United States right now, says Thomas Mancini, program manager for concentrated-solar-power technology at Sandia National Laboratory in Albuquerque, NM. That's equivalent to about six nuclear-power plants. BrightSource Energy has contracts to provide 2.6 gigawatts of solar power with concentrated solar power (a previous version of this story cited only one of two 1.3 gigawatt contracts), and Solar Millenium has announced a project that would generate nearly one gigawatt of power.

Story continues below


Stirling Energy Systems technology uses 12-meter-wide mirrors in the shape of a parabolic dish to concentrate sunlight onto a Stirling engine. The difference in temperature between the hot and cool sides of the engine is used to drive pistons and generate 25,000 watts of electricity. The first phase of the company's large-scale projects will use 12,000 of these dishes to generate 300 megawatts of power. Simington expects electricity from the systems to cost between 12 and 15 cents per kilowatt hour, higher than the cheapest sources of electricity--such as coal-fired power plants--but competitive in many markets, especially in the afternoon, when prices are highest.

Earlier this month the company unveiled its production design. Compared to several prototypes that have been tested for several years at Sandia National Laboratory, the new design cuts about two metric tons from the weight of each dish and reduces the number of mirrors in each from 80 to 40. The simplified design can be built in large quantities using equipment in existing factories for automobiles.

Comments

  • solar thermal breakthrough
    VULVOX Inc's breakthrough collectors will be able to generate more than double the amount of power generated by current solar power tower plants! The Abengoa solar power tower in Spain is currently the worlds biggest. If it is retrofitted with VULVOX hybrid solar energy collectors it will generate 46.5 megawatts, not 20 as it does currently.

    The dual solar thermal-photovoltaic system will wrest approximately twice as much power from an area as regular solar thermal or photovoltaic energy systems. Our technology can be used to retrofit existing parabolic troughs and solar power towers to increase their efficiency. Besides applications at utility scale solar power plants that are contributing electricity to the California power grid, they will also have an important advantage in the upcoming industry of rooftop solar power. Apartment buildings, offices and industrial buildings all have flat roofs that can accommodate our solar power systems and the greater efficiency of dual thermal-photovoltaic energy generation systems will make it cost competitive with other generation systems. Between 2009 and 2012 it is expected that the amount of installed CSP solar thermal power in the United States will grow 14 times!

    The Vulvox collectors will not depend upon complicated advances in quantum or solid state physics. Our novel combination photovoltaic-solar thermal collectors will achieve the unprecedented efficiencies predicted here by means of relatively simple modifications to solar energy equipment; modifications that can be developed at a moderate cost.
    The Vulvox solar system will generate higher power levels than competing parabolic troughs and solar power towers, while retaining all of the storage capabilities of solar thermal power.


    Contact us for more information.
    HTTP://VULVOX.TRIPOD.COM
    Rate this comment: 12345

    protn7
    07/28/2009
    Posts:69
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    • Re: solar thermal breakthrough
      Dude, you've invented a website! The patent office will patent a peanut butter sandwich so that doesn't mean anything either*. As flaky as SES is, at least it isn't spam.

      * I'd cure our patent system very simply -- charge a linearly growing amount every year to maintain a patent (then only the valuable ones would be maintained) and double the charge every year that a patent is not reduced to practice (that would eliminate the troll patents).
      Rate this comment: 12345

      GaryB
      08/01/2009
      Posts:64
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
    • Re: solar thermal breakthrough
      Neil, you have spammed this rubbish for years on several forums, yet you have produced no product.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      N O M
      08/16/2009
      Posts:23
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
  • Is this classic vaporware?
    SES has themselves in the news again? Still with nothing but another single prototype? (Now serial #3, with the new high of 31% efficiency, up from the 29% efficiency of the 1984 prototype. Yes, it's been since 1984!) I remember in early 2005 SES received the contract mentioned to build 800 megawatts. This was exciting news as it seemed the technology developed in the government research labs was ready for production. But after 4 years of silence, it obviously wasn't. [Try Wikipedia for background.]

    It would have been useful in this article to report on the corporate history as well-- not just the latest press release. For example, from 2005, "Stirling Energy Systems makes Fortune Magazine’s 25 BREAKOUT COMPANIES 2005", and from Feb 2005 Popular Science Magazine - "Dishing Out Real Power - Costs are down, interest is up, and the Stirling solar system is ready to flick the switch." (oops, they weren't). I don't know what is different now for 2010 than it was in 2005. They still seem to have just a prototype, and in 2005 they seemed even further along. This is so different than the typical VC funded startup.

    From reading the Sandia National Labs, etc. reports, the Stirling dish technology seems very promising-- both in efficiency (area required), cost, and impact (e.g. water use). It would be great to commercialize this, but now I just have this memory of false promises from SES. I really wish the company well, but now I wonder if there will be 4 more years of a prototype here or there, or will they really make a factory?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    carlhage
    07/28/2009
    Posts:21
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: Is this classic vaporware?
      Quote: The company is currently building a 1.5-megawatt, 60-unit demonstration plant that will use the company's latest design. Stirling expects to finish that project by the end of the year. Unquote. Sixty units sounds like more than vaporware to me. Of course, it's not finished yet.

      Just finished reading a story about Phoenix Technology's reflecting concentrator dishes using both high efficiency photovoltaics as well as heat reclamation for water heating. Got to say, some kind of hybrid system taking advantage of both the concentrated light and heat sounds like the most efficient and cost effective way to go. I would be interested to see if someone could engineer a hybrid photovoltaic, with a thermal Stirling engine mopping up the waste heat. Sunlight is after all rich in both visible light and heat, and a system that only uses one or the other is leaving quite a bit on the table. And this way, the heat could also be stored for nighttime energy generation.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      ArtInvent
      07/28/2009
      Posts:28
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      • Re: Is this classic vaporware?
        I have invented the very thing you wanted combination Stirling dish pV system.
        It will be patented in the next month.
        take a look at the solar enrgy page
        on the vulvox website.
        http://vuvlox.tripod.com
        Rate this comment: 12345

        protn7
        07/29/2009
        Posts:69
        Avg Rating:
        2/5
      • Re: Is this classic vaporware?
        Water heat co-production does seem practical with the Stirling dish. Unlike the solar tower/trough projects, the Stirling dish systems could be used individually instead of in large arrays (once in mass production). So one unit could be placed at a farm or factory and waste heat could be used for building hot water, heat, and possibly adsorption cooling.

        I don't think the Stirling engine would work with a concentrating PV system, because the temperatures required for PV are relativly low (the cells lose efficiency as temperature rises). Note the concentration in the SES dish is over 4000x (38ft on 7"), while concentrating PV is around 100-500x.

        I asked one concentrating PV manufacturer about the possibility of recovering heat via water circulation, and they claimed it was not cost effective (I don't know why) so they were not pursuing it. The higher temperature of the Stirling engine and 25kW to get rid of per dish makes these more practical for water heating with waste heat.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        carlhage
        07/29/2009
        Posts:21
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
    • Re: Is this classic vaporware?
      I too wish them well, but am I the only one, or does a stirling engine (not easy to manufacture these due to high tolerances needed) plus the heavy coils for generation, the need to handle very high temperatures etc mounted on a large solar tracking dish attached to a strong pylon presumably with a mechanism for getting the power off of this moving joint (brush connection?), all this needing to stand weather etc ...

      Why does this not seem like a very simple solution to me? Seems like an extremely challenging, hard, complex engineering problem with lots of potential points of failure.  No wonder they are in the Nth "any day now" prototype -- I'm not trying to belittle this, since, working in robotics, I deeply respect how hard it is to make reliable things, I'm just dubious that this will be competitive with fixed concentrator systems.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      GaryB
      08/01/2009
      Posts:64
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
  • Cheaper Solar Thermal Stirling Power
    Great work! I humbly suggest keep moving the stirling engine into focus instead of the dish and using concentric circular solar troughs and this may be possible at sea more easily. Instead of parabolic troughs; there are flat angled  fresnel lens type mirror reflector platforms that are better yet. This is all cheaper to build, maintain and repair. And if we want simultaneous direct light to electric capture how about thermionics instead of photocells at the stirling engine, they like it hot and also transparent layered  I.R. to U.V. photocells over the mirrors. This is all old stuff existing technology in a new package here for you. Just think how much easier this will all be in space. Great work yours truly Arecibo Harry
    Rate this comment: 12345

    hankusage@gm...
    08/04/2009
    Posts:3
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
  • Cheaper Solar Thermal Stirling Power

         Kiss this Dish
         Great work. But some idiot critic forgot to mention steam gimbals, rings, transducers, microwave and lasers will be needed to move and keep the stirling engines and or thermionics and or nano heat exchangers in focus to keep it simple.  That would allow for stationary mountain and later crater "stator" slope reflectors even in inhabited areas. These reflectors could be hundreds of miles or more across, self cleaning by rain or self contained spray  runoff heat capture and cooling on otherwise wasted urban and rural real estate for real peak to peak, point of purchase "4P" power anywhere in the universes. So this idiot critic can kiss this dish, you'd think this was The President's birthday or something. Oops I'm afraid this idiot critic is me. !) Arecibo Harry
    Rate this comment: 12345

    hankusage@gm...
    08/05/2009
    Posts:3
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
  • CHEAPER SOLAR THERMAL POWER
       Great work but some critics are just abit ridiculous. Hey and someone should tell this guy it is the President's birthday! Happy Birthday Mr. President! I mean why not just use steam electrolysis to make hydrogen fuel along with the stirling engine. And how are you supposed to put ""4P" peek to peek point of purchase power plants" around inhabited areas? Put them on the rooftops?! .Well maybe that would work? If we used retrofit reflectors on all the city and suburban rooftops to reflect sunlight to one focal point or another, sure would stop any line loss and it would be free! And everyone everywhere just got free power and the power to be free! Happy bearthday to us all! But you'd need some fedral government body to organize it like this and if you had the DOE you could really do it. That sure would get anyone elected and make profits boom. I quess all recessions are over with this as collateral for all the mortgages.
         As far as using this as a multi purpose power generator the next thing this critic is going to say, is use the same "kiss dish" on deserts mountains  and farms and also use the same solar reflectors as microwave rectennas to download microwave power from power satelites orbiting  in space  too like some kind of standard pattern. Well that might be safe in rural areas and even on oceans and that would almost be free too; compared to today: and steam electrolysis would make it portable: as piped liquid hydrogen or hydrogen hydride: and keep it's own superconducting noresistance power lines along side cool all in one step: with the same liquid nitrogen to keep it safe. You might as well put a maglev or suspended high speed cable train or tube train there in the same step: and use it as  a SMESS superconducting magnetic electric power storage unit too. I mean that assumes some kind of economy of scale and multiplier effect that would make us all every single person on earth wealthy and end all poverty forever. You'd think we lived in a global  free market democracy or something.
           It's just too big. You don't see anything even in nature like a giant solar thermionic steam electolysis microwave IR to UV photocell fresnel lens reflector thats keeping us all alive and is hundreds  or even thousands of miles across; heck you might as well build it the size of America make it say 2,160 miles across with a surface of 14,650,000 square miles  and let's get really ridiculous and put it in space and cover a half a degree of sky. This is pie in the sky stuff! Why not just shoot for  oops by God it's  the moon. There's one there already. Dang mooned myself again! Got to love those critics. Arecibo Harry Harry.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    hankusage@gm...
    08/05/2009
    Posts:3
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
  • stirling energy
    I believe there is some "vaporware" here. This may be a dead-end for this company, the innovators in and around it  (even their contractors/manufacturers - it is survival of the innovator out there) will take the opportunity to leap-frog/progress the technology into scalable, cheaper to manufacture in the USA, versions.  Watch the UK green sector especially for breakthroughs...and for Obama money, well, nothing says "made in the USA" like manufacturing the stirling engine in the good ol' great white north...Canada.  Guelph to be exact. 

    Something good will come of all of this work. Will it come from SES? Not sure...but there are a lot of smart people in a lot of companies trying all over the world..and a lot of submarine companies already relying on it. 

    SolFocus (and I do not work for SolFocus) has an interesting way to enhance efficency in their applications. In extrapolating their progress, perhaps the most efficient use of solar radiation will be a hybrid of several technologies.

    The only question I have on the path SES has chosen is why did they choose a first generation patented design when a second generation design was available?  There is not enough information in the technical journals or articles to understand.   I guess we will all eagerly await the first plant installation and connectivity to the grid.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    offthegrid
    08/11/2009
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    4/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

The Marcellus Shale Gas Rush
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.