Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

IBM Invests in Battery Research

Continued from page 1

By Katherine Bourzac

Thursday, June 11, 2009

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Safety problems with lithium-metal batteries can arise when they're recharged. "When you charge and discharge, you have to electroplate and strip the metal over and over again," says Dahn, who is not a contributor to the IBM project. Over time, just as in a lithium-ion battery, the lithium-metal surface becomes rough, which can lead to thermal runaway, when the battery literally burns until all the reactants inside are used up. But Narayan says that lithium-air batteries are inherently safer than previously developed lithium-metal batteries as well as today's lithium-ion batteries because only one of the reactants is contained in the cell. "A lithium-air cell needs air from outside," says Narayan. "You will never get a runaway reaction because air is limited."

PolyPlus Battery has been working on lithium metal-air technology for about six years and has some dramatic evidence of the technology's viability: floating among clownfish in an aquarium tank at the company's headquarters, a lithium-metal battery pulls in oxygen from the salt water to power a green LED. The company has also developed a prototype battery that pulls oxygen from ambient air. But Steven Visco, founder and vice president of research at the company, says that lithium metal-air batteries are "still a young technology that's not ready to be commercialized."

IBM's Narayan points to two remaining major problems with lithium metal-air technology. First, the design of the cathode needs to be optimized so that the lithium oxide that forms when oxygen is pulled inside the battery won't block the oxygen intake channels. Second, better catalysts are needed to drive the reverse reaction that recharges the battery.

Narayan says that it won't be clear how much money and how much time the project will take until about a year and half from now, after research has begun. He estimates that the company will devote about five years to the project. IBM will probably not make the batteries but will license the technology to manufacturers.

Comments

  • Limited Resources?
    Not to demean any technology for its advancements and potential contributions, but to try to keep things in perspective, how much can any one technology contribute to our energy problem?

    The question for lithium batteries is applicable for any other energy technology. Even assuming a technology is ready for deployment and is operating at its fullest potential, there are questions of strategic availability, accessibility, manufacturing/refining capacity, distribution, environmental impact and commercial viability of the necessary raw materials and finished product.

    In lithium's case, what are the estimated lithium reserves, where are they located and what is the projected demand? There are certainly reserve limits and accessibility issues. Even with efficient recycling efforts, the auto industry alone would require huge quantities of lithium to power every car world wide, replacing the gasoline engine. How far can this be taken?

    dwwhouse
    06/11/2009
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Limited Resources?
      There does seem to be an assumption that we are looking for a single technology and a single resource to replace those that we have (for a short while longer) - or at least as few as possible. Is that necessary, or would it make more sense to develop as diverse a group as possible, and use whichever was locally most appropriate?
      In any case, I agree that a sentence or two about reserves for the main resources, and their accessibility, would improve any article about a new technology. 

      SJA
      06/11/2009
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
    • Re: Limited Resources?
      Your comments about Lithium are valid concerns. Maybe advancements in metal-air batteries can eventually be applied to aluminum-air batteries. Research has been directed there in the past. Maybe the abundance of aluminum or some other suitable metal will become a trade-off for the lower performance of aluminum versus lithium. It could well be that an aluminum-air battery would store three times the energy and still be light-weight, inexpensive and meet consumers' expectations.

      MakeSense
      06/14/2009
      Posts:93
      Avg Rating:
      3/5

This discussion has been moved to our discussions forum.

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Making 3D Maps on the Move
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.