Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Flexible Silicon Solar Cells

Continued from page 1

By Katherine Bourzac

Monday, October 06, 2008

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Flexible solar cells made from another form of silicon, called amorphous silicon, have found a place in niche applications where low weight is critical. However, these cells haven't come into wider use because they're much less efficient than the crystalline silicon used in conventional solar cells. There are many groups working on new materials, including polymers for flexible solar cells. But these materials don't yet match the efficiency and durability of silicon, says Ray Chen, a professor in the microelectronics research center at the University of Texas at Austin. "I can't say silicon will be the material in the long term," says Chen. "But based on the data we have at this moment, [monocrystalline] silicon is a very robust material and has the advantage of reliability and efficiency.

A major advantage of making solar-cell arrays using his transfer-printing process, says Rogers, is the ability to control the spacing between the microcells. Sparse arrays of the cells are semitransparent and could be used as tinted, energy-producing window coatings. Rogers also hopes that the thin solar cells will replace conventional solar cells on roofs and in other places where solar cells are already found. If the Illinois technology does prove to be cheaper and easier to transport and install than conventional cells, it could remove some of the barriers to more widespread use of solar power.

Still, questions remain concerning the efficiency of Rogers's solar cells. To be game changers, these cells will need to have an efficiency closer to 15 percent, says Branz. There are existing methods for increasing the efficiency of monocrystalline silicon solar cells to more than 20 percent, says Rogers, and these methods could be applied to the microcells as well, although the University of Illinois researchers have not yet focused on optimizing the material's efficiency.

Comments

  • Solar Cell Efficiency
    >>>The best solar cells on the market convert more than 20 percent of the sunlight that falls on them into energy.<<<

    While 20% efficiency may be reasonably close for the majority of commercially available solar panels, more efficient solar cells are currently available. Spectrolab offers 29.9% efficient Triple Junction (XTJ) Solar Cells.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    LDighera
    10/06/2008
    Posts:13
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Solar Cell Efficiency
      There was multiple lab samples that showed 40.8% and 40.7% efficiency. With quite a few companies around offering 30+% efficient cells. But you need to understand that such cells are expansive plus their lifetime expectancy several time shorter compare to monosilicon panels(which is usually 16%-18% efficient). So primarily market is space satellites (life expectancy around 15 years at most plus way bigger budget).
      Rate this comment: 12345

      TestPilot
      10/11/2008
      Posts:11
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
  • game changers?
    are not efficiency but cost of the cell.

    BUT if you can 'mass produce' the installation of the cells then this significantly reduces the cost also.

    AND if the cells are sited near users rather than in huge desert arrays there is a 35% transmission loss elimination, offering even greater savings.

    I had thought rooftop installations were ideal but it appears that ground based 'farms' can be install way more quickly and cost effectively.

    For reducing costs, mass roll printed cells avoid any individual wafer handling and are a fraction of the cost of silicon solar cells which till recently over their lifetime consume more energy for production and installation than they ever produce.

    companies like aes solar's venture with nanosolar produce roll printed cells like this.  They are not thin enuf to stick on windows, which is an innovative idea but they are ideal for solar farms.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    erbium
    10/12/2008
    Posts:110
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • Flexible Polymer Substrates
    Just for your information. We recently performed a feasibility study on the use of transparant / UV resistant polyimide substrates for solar cells. They have some technical + and -. Regarding the cost I am not sure, is there any indication of suggested subtrate cost per m2 solar cell? Thanks either way for this thread.

    Regards,
    Rodney Bennet
    Composite Agency Team
    Rate this comment: 12345

    rodbennet
    10/13/2008
    Posts:5
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • The large spacing is a drawback
    Rogers's flexible (transferred) silicon solar cell has a drawback of large spcing between individual cell units. This means that his solar cell should merely have an highest efficiency of: W/(W+d) multiply the efficiency of commercial silicon cells. W is the width of the cell unit and d is the spacing between neighbouring cells.

    Inaddition, production cost is another issue confining Rogers's flexible solar cell. In commercial solar cell production, except for the P (n-type) doping, other procedures are very easy and trustable.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    fengping
    10/14/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    3/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

The Marcellus Shale Gas Rush
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.