Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Cheap Hydrogen

A new process uses sunlight and a nanostructured catalyst to inexpensively and efficiently generate hydrogen for fuel.

By Kevin Bullis

Thursday, January 31, 2008

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Nanoptek, a startup based in Maynard, MA, has developed a new way to make hydrogen from water using solar energy. The company says that its process is cheap enough to compete with the cheapest approaches used now, which strip hydrogen from natural gas, and it has the further advantage of releasing no carbon dioxide.

Solar gases: A parabolic trough can focus sunlight on nanostructured titania, improving the efficiency of a new system for generating hydrogen by splitting water.
Credit: John Guerra, Nanoptek

Nanoptek, which has been developing the new technology in part with grants from NASA and the Department of Energy (DOE), recently completed its first venture-capital round, raising $4.7 million that it will use to install its first pilot plant. The technology uses titania, a cheap and abundant material, to capture energy from sunlight. The absorbed energy releases electrons, which split water to make hydrogen. Other researchers have used titania to split water in the past, but Nanoptek researchers found a way to modify titania to absorb more sunlight, which makes the process much cheaper and more efficient, says John Guerra, the company's founder and CEO.

Researchers have known since the 1970s that titania can catalyze reactions that split water. But while titania is a good material because it's cheap and doesn't degrade in water, it only absorbs ultraviolet light, which represents a small fraction of the energy in sunlight. Other researchers have tried to increase the amount of sunlight absorbed by pairing titania with dyes or dopants, but dyes aren't nearly as durable as titania, and dopants haven't produced efficient systems, says John Turner, who develops hydrogen generation technologies at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), in Golden, CO.

Story continues below


Nanoptek's approach uses insights from the semiconductor industry to make titania absorb more sunlight. Guerra says that chip makers have long known that straining a material so that its atoms are slightly pressed together or pulled apart alters the material's electronic properties. He found that depositing a coating of titania on dome-like nanostructures caused the atoms to be pulled apart. "When you pull the atoms apart, less energy is required to knock the electrons out of orbit," he says. "That means you can use light with lower energy--which means visible light" rather than just ultraviolet light.

The strain on the atoms also affects the way that electrons move through the material. Too much strain, and the electrons tend to be reabsorbed by the material before they split water. Guerra says that the company has had to find a balance between absorbing more sunlight and allowing the electrons to move freely out of the material. Nanoptek has also developed cheaper ways to manufacture the nanostructured materials. Initially, the company used DVD manufacturing processes, but it has since moved on to a still-cheaper proprietary process.

Comments

  • How nice...
    This sounds great except....

    How much does this hydrogen COST!??

    I can't judge the technology unless they state a price per unit.  Is this $20.00/gal of gasoline equivalent or $2.00/gal of gasoline equivalent?  Until someone can state a price, this is no different then the pie in the sky claims for nuclear reactors in the 1950's.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    tsaidak
    01/31/2008
    Posts:16
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: How nice...
      Actually, this is a nice development. The rutile material is a type of sand. We probably have more of this stuff on the Hawaiian Islands and Pacific North Beaches than we know what to do with. Possibly much less expensive than the materials used to make solar cells, and if I read the article properly, the purity levels to be useful are much lower making mass production easier.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      mkogrady
      01/31/2008
      Posts:206
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
  • cheap hydrogen
    Splitting water at a small particle creates not only hydrogen but also oxygen, at that particle. The result is not a fuel but an explosive. Water needs to be split in separate compartments, as in (in fact highly efficient) electrolysis, so that the two gases are collected separately.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    djs
    01/31/2008
    Posts:24
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: cheap hydrogen
      several options for hydrogen-permeable membranes exist that are impermeable for oxygen.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      dnweiss
      01/31/2008
      Posts:2
      • Re: cheap hydrogen
        the selectivity + flux requirements seem impossible to meet with membranes - the safety issues with compressed stoichiometric mixtures of oxygen and hydrogen make this scheme totally impractical
        Rate this comment: 12345

        djs
        02/04/2008
        Posts:24
        Avg Rating:
        3/5
  • home heat
    I wonder, will a gas furnace adapt to hydrogen?  I notice the first two comments are negative; sigh....  1.  Of course there's a price consideration and 2. I'm sure none of the scientist-developers have thought of the oxygen production that occurs each and every time one separates water.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    rttedrow
    01/31/2008
    Posts:43
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • what is the yield?
    The most important question is what is the yield per m^2 (or hectare, acre, mi^2, whatever) per year?  Concentrated Solar Power in the desert (e.g. sunlight at 2700 kWh/m^2/year) and 30% efficiency (i.e. 800 kWh/m^2/year) and hydrolysis at 60kWh/kg (maybe 50kWh/kg someday) gives 16 kg/m^2/year.  What is the kg/m^2/year for Nanoptek?

    The other question is what pressure hydrogen is produced?  (Is a separate compression step required?)
    Rate this comment: 12345

    killian
    01/31/2008
    Posts:70
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • What about water consumption
    Forgive my ignorance as I have no knowledge of this technology. I am curious if splitting water to make hydrogen will essentially be competing with human consumption as ethanol does? I realize that the emissions revert back to water, but to what degree? We already have shortages and this type of process seems to contribute to them.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    KGC
    01/31/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: What about water consumption
      maybe it works with salt water? if so, it shouldnt be an issue.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      brunascle
      01/31/2008
      Posts:68
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      • Re: What about water consumption
        If it works with salt water, then perhaps large fields can be deployed to generate some hydrogen, but to some extent it can be used as a desalinization tool too. Pipe salt water into some useless desert areas, and make some gas with the sunlight Ingnite it and make some water. Leave the sodium behind!
        Rate this comment: 12345

        mkogrady
        01/31/2008
        Posts:206
        Avg Rating:
        3/5
    • Re: What about water consumption
      Water consumption is *not* an issue:
      1) Just to grow corn for ethanol production you need 100s of times the amount of water per unit of ethanol. This process needs just 10 units of water for 1 unit of hydrogen.
      2) Water can be desalinated cheaply in energy terms. 1kg of hydrogen (which needs 10kg of water to be made) contains enough energy to desalinate 4000l of water.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      who_knows
      01/31/2008
      Posts:3
      Avg Rating:
      2/5
      • Re: What about water consumption
        Or, to put it in more easily understood terms: the same amount of water you use for a single shower (100l+) can be used to drive your SUV over 200km (120 miles) once converted to hydrogen. Seriously, water consumption is not an issue. Cost of this technology might be.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        who_knows
        01/31/2008
        Posts:3
        Avg Rating:
        2/5
    • Re: What about water consumption
      When the fuel is used - water is recreated
      Rate this comment: 12345

      michro
      02/01/2008
      Posts:3
  • Several Concerns
    The article hints at the cost, saying it nearly matches SMR, which is well above reasonable targets for the "hydrogen economy."

    The amount of water - salt water does not work - would be enormous. Recall that 89% of the weight of water is Oxygen, so it takes 10 pounds of water to get a pound of Hydrogen, assuming perfect efficiency.

    Virtually every technique employed to improve renewable hydrogen does a much better job improving PV cell efficiency, which is already well above any hydrogen technology. Anyone putting up the cash would likely spend it on PV cells or better, which need no water.

    Also, the oxygen produced with hydrogen is caustic, so many of these ideas literally fall apart.

    Beyond that, what do you do next? As one post mentioned, there would be compressors and pipes and storage tanks, followed by more pipes and electric generators (in the case of storage) or a hypothetical fuel cell.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    MakeSense
    01/31/2008
    Posts:93
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • Hydrogen
    Unless I can put one of these things on my roof and safely fill my vehicle, I'm going to be a slave to the Oil Companies. Please, we need to be able to fill our energy powerd vehicle at the end of an extention cord.
    Hydrogen is what powers the Electric Grid. If the Oil Companies want to be part of this let them buy the Electric Companies.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    prodevman
    01/31/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: Hydrogen
      Let George do it? We been dare, dun dat, no hope. Now, with a Bell Mason jar, some electronics, the good sence not to blow your (self) off the planet, and a weekend's work, you just may have a means to free us all from that slavery you are so quick to embrace. 
      Rate this comment: 12345

      boz_hobbs
      07/27/2008
      Posts:4
      Avg Rating:
      1/5
  • Good for synthetic fuels...
    An obvious near term application is to use this technology to create liquid fuels. A hydrogen intense liquid fuel, such as butanol (C4-H10-O) could be created using a modified syngas FT approach or possibly even be carried out in-situ.

    Sourcing the carbon would never be much of an issue (one could always resort to biomass). Methane could also be easily created.

    Another option would be creating a synthetic high performance aviation fuel.

    While I'm ranting, I'll go ahead and make the obvious statement that the oxygen is also a valuable by product. Stored/transported seperately it (O2) will be of extreme value in organic rankine cycle turbines in the near future. 
    Rate this comment: 12345

    GreenPlease
    01/31/2008
    Posts:7
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: Good for synthetic fuels...
      Alkanes may make more sense than alcohols. Considering FT isn't very efficient, how about drawing CO2 from the air (zeolite?) and combining the hydrogen with it to make methane (CH4). Much higher process efficiency, and the methane infrastructure is common (natural gas). Methane is a pretty good fuel and transports and handles easier than hydrogen. Could be burned in CCGTs or in CNG vehicles or for heating purposes or even as a metallurgical reducing agent. If necessary, the methane can be upgraded to propane/butane fairly efficiently. Much better perspective than hydrogen IMHO.

      Of course, it mostly depends on what the economics are like.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Siphon
      02/04/2008
      Posts:145
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
  • Hydrogen for Power
    I liked two of the points at the end of the article.  Siting the equipment near it's users and using hydrogen to store solar power overnight make a great deal of sense.  In this way, small communities could take charge of their own electric generation the way they are trying now to take charge of their communications.  These plants could be placed near the community as a solar power farm.  Some of the received light would be used and the rest stored.  Water use would not be an issue as the hydrogen would be recycled back into water at night.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    TimG
    02/01/2008
    Posts:11
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Hydrogen for Power
      Best of all, TimG, the oil cmpanies will REACT to any MASS ASSERTION of a COMMITMENT to this technology on a GRASSROOTS level. I am in full process of finding how to heat water and cook with this HHO (generated) fuel. You ought to do the same.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      boz_hobbs
      07/27/2008
      Posts:4
      Avg Rating:
      1/5
  • Hydrogen from Aluminum
    Aluminum can generate hydrogen on demand. Aluminum solves both the storage and generation problem. You can make hydrogen from Aluminum safely and instantly at home, without the use of caustic soda.

    http://www.instructables.com/id/SODA-CAN-HYDROGEN-GENERATOR/
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Biotele
    02/03/2008
    Posts:8
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • Useful Oxygen.
    The oxygen is useful in the gasification of biomass for producing pure syngas(Hydrogen and carbon monoxide).
    Rate this comment: 12345

    DJTal
    02/05/2008
    Posts:133
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • [no subject]
    hydrogen is a by product of pebble bed technology for new nuclear reactors...10,000 tons a day...
    Rate this comment: 12345

    skipcjr
    03/15/2008
    Posts:6
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • Nanoptek
    Here's an idea.
    Let's form a company to develop hydrogen production using direct solar.
    Let's get the public to fund the initial research by investing in a lobyist.
    Then let's get venture capitalists to fund the production R&D.
    We can patent it (using the US legal system of course) then license the manufacture offshore (avoiding the high labor costs and legal exposure to that same legal system we wanted to protect our patent and intellectual property) and then sell it to the US consumer and never pay the public a penny.

    Then we can buy a G5, avoid the airport security, screw our hookers enroute, and generally live a well deserved priviledged life, while the rest of the rodents squirm to put a meal on the table.
    Sounds good to me.

    Little known fact; 0.9% of the US population holds 94.6% of the US equity.



    Rate this comment: 12345

    vc
    05/14/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
    • Re: Nanoptek
      Minus the sarcasm in the previous statement, I think the idea is a great one; to start a company now and take advantage of the tremendous opportunities in store for this emerging technology.  I personally would love to be a part of a start-up company that produces inexpensive and clean energy.  This has been a dream of mine - to be a part of the hydrogen revolution - for the past 35 some years, since I was very young.  Realistically speaking - how would one go about switching careers into this industry?  I am ready!
      Rate this comment: 12345

      vonofdallas
      05/17/2008
      Posts:1
    • Re: Nanoptek
      People badmouth this guy for knowing how the REAL world works. Sarcasm?  The naysayers are the same people who naively voted the people into office who perpetuate the "system" because it's the only way to survive as a  politician. That nice couple next door who harp about family values & the like sscare the hell out of me. Chances are, they are referring to THIER values.
      Here on planet Earth, you CAN screw your way to the top! And you should! Just emulate the ones who have gone before us-Vanderbilt, Rockefeller, etc. Me? I'll take the G-5, The hookers and champagne.
      Seriously dude, point well made, and humorously so. You can't possibly be an engineer!
      Rate this comment: 12345

      madsci
      08/05/2008
      Posts:7
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
  • cheap H2
    this is Randy Lewis is Fla,  I have a vision of creating a selfsustaining system from home using solar to create hydrogen to fuel personal vehicles.  You new system sounds like it might be appropriate to use at home as long as one has good sunlight.

    Are you selling these units yet?  If so what kind of costs are involved?  I am working up a grant proposal for funding so hopefully in a few months I will have the funding and can purchase a system.

    Thanks and God bless,

    Randy
    941-240-1060
    Rate this comment: 12345

    randy00789
    06/10/2008
    Posts:1

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

The Marcellus Shale Gas Rush
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.