Such a method would eliminate the need for the superhigh temperatures and toxic catalysts used in other thermochemical methods for cellulosic-biofuel production. While O'Connor says that he is still improving Kior's catalyst, his first versions are different kinds of modified clays, which are both cheap and environmentally friendly. The product is high quality as well, containing less acid, oxygen, and water. These characteristics make it suitable for burning as heating oil or for use in petroleum refineries, which can use existing processes and equipment to convert it into the longer hydrocarbon chains of gasoline and diesel fuel.
Bioecon has produced lab-scale quantities of its biocrude, a few grams at a time, from materials such as wood shavings, sugarcane waste, and various grasses. While the input material affects the yield somewhat, O'Connor says that the output is "all very similar, so we do not have a real preference." This means that the process can work around the world, with whatever biomass is locally available, almost year-round.
Kior is already in talks with at least two oil companies to establish partnerships to further develop the technology. It is starting a pilot plant with one company that should produce around 20 kilograms of biocrude a day within six to twelve months, says Kior CEO Rob van der Meij. If all goes well, the process could scale up to production of hundreds of kilos per day by 2009, and refined versions of Kior's biocrude might be blended into gasoline or diesel by 2010. In addition to being renewable, these fuels would have lower sulfur and nitrogen content, which should decrease smog in cities such as Los Angeles and Houston.
Because of its ability to slide into the existing petroleum refining and delivery infrastructure, the technology has a huge cost advantage, says O'Connor. It could also be adopted much more rapidly, according to Khosla. "If you can do a solution that's compatible with the oil companies and their current refineries, it becomes much easier for them to get comfortable with it," he says. "Getting them into the game would be a big addition."
Steve Deutch, a senior research scientist at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, says that the little information Kior has released about its process is plausible enough, but that until the details are available, the company's claims are "not really possible to evaluate." The main challenge for Kior, or anyone working on cellulosic fuels, Deutch says, is to develop a process simple enough to bring close to the sources of biomass--farms. "Collecting biomass and getting enough of it in one place to make a difference is a problem in the biomass world," Deutch says. "Trucking costs can become exorbitant. You want to preprocess it at the farm and then ship a high-density, high-energy intermediate to processing plants."
Comments
The answer is ofcourse harvesting of seaweed. You have huge refinary ships that process the seaweed collected with smaller boats. You pump the ready fuel to tankers and the waste products can be shipped as fertilizers (?)
Land can be used for more constructive things. E.g. forests
norppa
11/09/2007
Posts:1
urian1975
11/09/2007
Posts:16
Tysto
11/09/2007
Posts:24
Why not use sewage treatment plants as biomass converters? The infrastructure for delivering the biomass is there, we know how to handle it safely, there's plenty of supply and we get a beneficial product out of it in the end (besides Milorganite). I'm sure the energy content of waste has to be something greater than zero and pipelines could be put in place to carry the fuel to distribution networks.
kearns
11/09/2007
Posts:29
- I think there is also potential for bringing into play a cost efficient domestic waste disposal strategy. I know that all my lawn and tree clippings go into the bin, but wouldn't it be great to tap into all that unused energy from my house, and my neighbor's house, etc. etc. Ad nauseum...!
Connerjason
11/09/2007
Posts:2
and there are literal forests in a couple of continents.Not withstanding our own ability to grow it.It could be a never ending resource.
McMillan968
11/10/2007
Posts:38
Rob van der Meij, KiOR Inc.
robvandermei...
11/11/2007
Posts:1
michael.copp...
11/11/2007
Posts:1
This is great news, if it pans out well.
Does the biomass need to be dried throughly for this process? Eliminating that step (and the ability to provide relatively decentralized/on-site processing) would be huge.
Congrats in the successes so far.
mbmurphy777
11/12/2007
Posts:14
RD
11/27/2007
Posts:114
RD
01/23/2008
Posts:114
seveprim
11/16/2007
Posts:1
DJTal
11/18/2007
Posts:133
markyannone
11/19/2007
Posts:2
Rudolf
11/19/2007
Posts:1
http://www.unh.edu/p2/biodiesel/article_alge.html
and
http://www.livefuels.com/
killian
11/26/2007
Posts:70
MICROBIOBOB
11/19/2007
Posts:2
At our house, we are gradually working our way towards going 'off the grid', but this makes us realize that the first step is reduction in consumption, since generally once you go off cheap fossil fuel, you really appreciate how much energy is worth and how hard it is to get.
So every article or discussion of some form of alternative energy supply should be accompanied by discussion of new and creative ways to reduce usage.
Generally, it seems like these reductions come from: Community (sharing things), being 'light', being more easily satisfied, moderating wants, better systems, and technology. It can be just as useful to look to the past as to the future for 'innovative' systemic (or even technological) solutions to many problems.
nelagnelag
11/26/2007
Posts:1
Daniel from ...
01/09/2008
Posts:8
This method sounds like a step forward from the high-energy biocrude processes proposed so far, which cost $100/bbl or more and make a low-quality fuel. Maybe Kior represents a technology that yields high-ER quality fuel for about $85/bbl.
The problem with costly alternatives is that they would be victims of their own success. Look at ethanol: facing a glut and high feedstock prices. If we make significant amounts of synfuels, then they need to be cheap in order to compete with falling oil prices. Otherwise, they remain marginal.
Without knowing specifics about these catalysts, it's quite possible that they will be in limited supply.
MakeSense
01/23/2008
Posts:93
Cost of implementing it would be low, but they wont go for it it would have to be wasteful and destructive and damage our planet beyond repair before you people get it. stop speaking it and start using it. hehehe lol You people looking for oil outa wood man oh man simple. Only for paint maybe, anyways enuff said some people really need to use their heads and not something else, or if we implement this, the other way around, ohhh ehehehe damn im funny.
hano
05/31/2008
Posts:3
MickeyFouse
12/09/2008
Posts:47