Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Nobel for Revolutionary Optical Technologies

The Nobel Prize in physics was awarded to a fiber-optics pioneer and the inventors of digital-imaging chips.

By Katherine Bourzac

Tuesday, October 06, 2009

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

The 2009 Nobel Prize in physics has been awarded to three researchers whose work has formed the basis of modern telecommunications and digital imaging. The prize recognizes Charles K. Kao, whose discoveries led to a breakthrough in fiber optics, and Willard S. Boyle and George E. Smith, who invented the CCD (charge-coupled device) image sensor.

Nobel laureates: The winners of this year’s Nobel Prize in physics are, from top to bottom, Charles K. Kao, formerly of Standard Telecommunication Laboratories, and Willard S. Boyle and George E. Smith, formerly of Bell Laboratories.
Credit: Richard Epworth, National Academy of Engineering, National Inventors Hall of Fame Foundation/SCANPIX

Optical fibers carry almost all telecom data and form the backbone of the Internet. "When combined with the laser and the transistor, the invention of an efficient, low-loss optical fiber has made nearly instantaneous communication possible across the entire globe," H. Frederick Dylla, director of the American Institute of Physics, said in a statement.

The work was done in the mid-1960s. The invention of the laser in the early 1960s spurred researchers to develop a practical transmission medium for light, which can transmit data much faster than radio waves. Optical fibers, however, didn't seem promising at the time because of their high rates of attenuation: only about 1 percent of the light sent through the fiber would be transmitted as far as 20 meters.

Kao's insight was to focus not only on the physics of light, but on the material properties of the medium itself. In 1966, as a young engineer at Standard Telecommunication Laboratories in Harlow, U.K., Kao discovered the underlying causes of attenuation in optical fiber: iron impurities were causing it to absorb and scatter the light. Pure glass, he suggested, would make a better carrier and would also present cost advantages.

After further studies of how light of different wavelengths travels through different media, Kao and his colleagues pointed to silicon dioxide as the best material. But silicon dioxide is difficult to work with. A team of researchers at Corning Glass Works realized Kao's designs in 1970, using a high-pressure reaction chamber to form the first low-loss optical fibers, and others at Bell Laboratories refined the manufacturing technique to bring down the cost.

Story continues below


Modern optical fibers are even better than what Kao predicted, losing just 5 percent of the light over a distance of a kilometer. In 1988 the first intercontinental optical fiber, which was 6,000 kilometers, was laid down between Europe and America; today there are over one billion kilometers of optical fiber around the world, with more being added each day.

Comments

  • Nice Article
    Very nicely written article. Thank you. Those guys surely deserve the Nobel Prize and more. Where would we be without their pioneering research? Congratulations to the new laureates.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Mapou
    10/07/2009
    Posts:65
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    • Re: Nice Article
      That's a very good point. Because that pioneering research is not supported as it once was.

      Look at where the CCD came from -- along with two other devices, the transistor and the laser, mentioned in the article but recognized previously with their own Nobels. All three emerged from a Bell Labs that no longer exists. I'm not just saying that Bell Labs is no more; the environment that allowed the inventions of the CCD, the laser, and the transistor was gone from the Labs long before Bell Labs itself was gone.

      Bell Labs' involvement with optical fibers is closer to the best we can expect of industrial labs today. The fundamental research was done by Kao at STL. Bell Labs' contribution came afterwards, making the manufacture of fiber practical. The Bell Labs of today (and even 25 years ago) would never have tried to do the Kao work. "99% attenuation at 20 meters? Skip it; we'll do something else." But 40-50 years ago (when Kao, Boyle, and Smith did their Nobel-winning work), the attitude would have been, "Let's ask a small, young, smart team to see how fundamental that limitation is." Or even, "These guys want to see how fundamental that limitation is. Let's fund them."

      What has changed? The entire business, social, and political spectrum. But it mostly boils down to the expectation of short-term return on investment. Fundamental research, with its uncertain payback and long payback times, cannot be supported by industry any more. It tends to be limited to universities today.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      dtutelman
      10/07/2009
      Posts:57
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      • Re: Nice Article
        As a journalist, I have just been exposed to Alcatel - Lucent executives bragging about Bell Labs remaining in their organization, the number of patents in 2008, the amount of scientists...  Did not seem such a landslide.  But the damage the demand for short term results is causing is universal.  Your comment also pounds on the demand upon universities' researchers, they have a difficult political task of convincing their funding agencies that "to know" is a good cause. And I am writing from Chile.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        nluco
        10/08/2009
        Posts:2
        Avg Rating:
        5/5
  • Why only one Prize ?
    These are two huge discoveries that have had a major impact on peoples lives.

    While in related fields, they are quite different, and could have merited one Physics prize for each discovery.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    mahonj
    10/07/2009
    Posts:8
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • [no subject]
    Well they both are genius and They also expand the knowledge regarding physics and this innovation is useful in future.
    Rate this comment: 12345

      neilkevin0...
    10/09/2009
    Posts:3
    Avg Rating:
    2/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

The Marcellus Shale Gas Rush
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Featured Content
Sponsored by:
White Papers

Twelve ways to reduce costs with SQL Server 2008
Find out how to reduce costs and get more efficient

Download

Total Economic Impact of SQL Server 2008 Upgrade
Forrester reports on increasing productivity and management capabilities

Download 

Achieving Cost and Resource Savings with UC
How Office Communications Server R2 and Exchange Server can make your business smarter and more efficient

Download 

The Compelling Case for Conferencing
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

How Windows Server 2008 R2 Helps Optimize IT and Save you Money
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V Live Migration
See how Windows Server 2008 R2 and Hyper-V enable virtualization and Live Migration

Download
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.