Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Nanopillar Solar Cells

A new solar-cell design could cut costs and is suitable for large-scale flexible panels.

By Prachi Patel

Monday, July 06, 2009

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, have made a new kind of solar cell by growing an array of upright nanoscale pillars on aluminum foil. They make bendable solar cells by encapsulating the entire cell inside a transparent, rubbery polymer. The design, the researchers suggest, could lead to solar cells that cost less than conventional silicon photovoltaics.

Cheap solar: A new solar cell is composed of an array of erect cadmium sulfide nanopillars (bottom) embedded inside a matrix of cadmium telluride. The entire cell, fabricated on thin aluminum foil, becomes bendable when encased in polymer.
Credit: Ali Javey, UC Berkeley

The nanopillars allow the researchers to use cheaper, lower-quality materials than those used in conventional silicon and thin-film technologies. What's more, the technique used to make the cells could be adapted to make rolls of flexible panels on thin aluminum foil, cutting manufacturing costs, says Ali Javey, an electrical-engineering and computer-sciences professor who led the work. The work is at an early stage, and "you won't know the cost until you do this using a roll-to-roll process," he says. "But if you can do it, the cost could be 10 times less than what's used to make [crystalline] silicon panels."

The solar cells are made of uniform 500-nanometer-high pillars of cadmium sulfide embedded in a thin film of cadmium telluride. Both materials are semiconductors used in thin-film solar cells. In an online Nature Materials paper, Javey and his colleagues showed that the cells have an efficiency of about 6 percent in transforming sunlight into electricity. Others have made cells with pillar designs, he says, but they used expensive methods to grow the pillars and could not get efficiencies above 2 percent.

In conventional cells, silicon absorbs light and creates free electrons, which need to get to the electrical circuit before they get trapped at defects or impurities in the material. This requires extremely pure, expensive crystalline silicon to achieve the most efficient photovoltaic devices.

The nanopillar design splits up silicon's duties: the material surrounding the pillars absorbs light, and the pillars transport them to the electrical circuit. This increases efficiency in two ways. The closely packed pillars trap light between them, helping the surrounding material absorb more. The electrons also have a very short distance to travel through the pillars, so there are fewer chances of their getting trapped at defects. That means you can use low-quality, less expensive materials, Javey says.

Comments

  • very very cool
    Rate this comment: 12345

    techron
    07/06/2009
    Posts:13
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: very very cool
      This is cool but why don't we use a different approach of increasing the efficency and begin to add the second variable which is to expand the metal as it heats up by the light.  There are plenty of metals out there that as they expand and contract they produce electricity.  Now we have two methods in one technology that would increase the efficency by 2 times.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      EESTAR
      07/13/2009
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
  • Materials selected
    The technology sounds great but from a sustainability standpoint do you want to promote a technology that uses cadmium (highly toxic and already banned under RoHS) and tellurium (which is one of the most rare elements on earth)?  Just because you can develop the technology, doesn't always mean you should.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    pdahlin
    07/06/2009
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Materials selected
      I agree pdahlin's opinion, if there is a new solar technology that needs the use of rubidium, you can research it,but donot expect it will be a wide-application technology.
      I always believe Silicon is the best material to develop the applicable solar technology for the world.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      gearss
      07/08/2009
      Posts:10
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
  • Electrons...
    I'm really interested in how photons become electrons in these solar devices.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    zavatone
    07/06/2009
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • CdTe misconceptions-clarification
    Cd might be banned under RoHS by itself, but not when combined together with Te, where it is much more stable-- Even though OSHA still considers all Cd-containing compounds as such-- unless ground to a very fine dust.  Burn tests for FSLR CdTe modules have been performed at Brookhaven National Laboratory, and it has been shown that common residential fires are not hot enough to vaporize CdTe the melting point of which is 1041 C. The potential for emissions only exists in large externally fed industrial fires, where the fires would probably be more damaging than the emitted CdTe.  Furthermore, Cd is produced naturally as a byproduct of Zn mining (at ~1/300 concentrations in Sphalerite), one of our most widely used industrial metals. Using the Cd for renewable energy purposes instead of disposing of it as hazardous waste is clearly a good application. HEPA filters in the CdTe deposition, laser scribing and maintenance chamber capture 99.97% of any emissions present, and can be processed to return Cd and Te to the feedstock.  End-of-use-recycling can also extend the life of Cd and Te, and is also cheaper on an energy and emissions basis than mining it in the first place.  Furthermore, the burning of Coal for electricity releases 2-7 g Cd/GWh whereas throughout the whole life-cycle of CdTe thin films, only 23.3 mg/GWh are released.  Good papers on this topic to read: "Could CdTe PV Modules Pollute the Environment? -- V.M. Fthenakis et. al., National PV EH&S Research Center ", "CdTe Photovoltaics: Life Cycle Environmental Profile and Comparisons" --V.M. Fthenakis, et. al. CLCA, Columbia University"
    Rate this comment: 12345

    ColumbiaMP
    07/07/2009
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
    • Re: CdTe misconceptions-clarification
      Thank you for the insight.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      canchem
      07/09/2009
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
    • Re: CdTe misconceptions-clarification
      The tempratures you describe to make these new solar sheets toxic are not uncommon with car fires.The electric car supporters have been waiting for this technology.Worrying...
      Rate this comment: 12345

      aka steve
      07/11/2009
      Posts:8
      Avg Rating:
      2/5
      • Re: CdTe misconceptions-clarification
        Great article and development.  As far as car fires, well, i think batteries and not solar cells are what people are waiting on for electric cars. 

        As far as rare elements, indium is up there, but then again gold is not cheap.  Is this something that will need to be engineered around to make it mass market I wonder, although it doesn't seem that way from the article.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        chir0pter
        07/11/2009
        Posts:10
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
        • Re: CdTe misconceptions-clarification
          Solar panels you can completely cover a car with-lighter,smaller batteries-lighter mechanical componets-ect...
          This will quickly replace bulky rigid panels for weight and space considerations.
          Turn any surface into a solar panel,laptop's that can be away from the power terminals all day,r/c planes that don't need charging,Any roof suppling the daytime needs,No heavy frames to be bolted down...
          Depending on the technical aspects a "tint" vesrion could be possable for office building windows.
          Imagination backed by brains and money can accomplish many things.
          Rate this comment: 12345

          aka steve
          07/12/2009
          Posts:8
          Avg Rating:
          2/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

The Marcellus Shale Gas Rush
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Featured Content
Sponsored by:
White Papers

Twelve ways to reduce costs with SQL Server 2008
Find out how to reduce costs and get more efficient

Download

Total Economic Impact of SQL Server 2008 Upgrade
Forrester reports on increasing productivity and management capabilities

Download 

Achieving Cost and Resource Savings with UC
How Office Communications Server R2 and Exchange Server can make your business smarter and more efficient

Download 

The Compelling Case for Conferencing
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

How Windows Server 2008 R2 Helps Optimize IT and Save you Money
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V Live Migration
See how Windows Server 2008 R2 and Hyper-V enable virtualization and Live Migration

Download
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.