Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Detecting Dirty Bombs from a Safe Distance

A modified NASA telescope could detect dangerous radioactive materials.

By Brittany Sauser

Tuesday, May 05, 2009

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Tracking and locating hazardous radioactive materials has become an immense concern for the United States Department of Homeland Security. In the wrong hands, materials snatched from a hospital or a nuclear plant could be used to build a "dirty bomb" that might cause major harm to human health and the environment.

Gamma detector: The new telescope has two detectors surrounded by eight photomultiplier tubes. The entire mobile telescope system is shown on top of the cart (bottom image) with the electronics of the lower shelf.
Credit: University of New Hampshire

Researchers at the University of New Hampshire (UNH) have now built a highly sensitive device for detecting radioactive materials remotely, using spare detectors from NASA's Compton Gamma-Ray Observatory. The detectors were originally intended to measure gamma rays in space. "It is a very robust, reliable, and precise piece of instrumentation that has already been proven to work in space," says James Ryan, the lead researcher for the telescope and a professor of physics at UNH. "If it works in space, you bet it will work on the ground."

Security personnel currently use handheld detectors to locate radioactive materials, but these instruments are often affected by background radiation and cannot always pinpoint the source of radiation accurately. "This is an important area that needs new detectors," says Neil Gehrels, chief of the astroparticle physics laboratory at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, in Greenbelt, MD. "The challenge is to build a system that is sensitive and detects the kinds of gamma rays that would be of security concern, and two, to build a robust system that can be used in the field."

Story continues below

The new telescope, called Gamma-Ray Experimental Telescope Assembly (GRETA), can fit into the back of a truck, allowing security personnel to spot high-energy gamma rays simply by scanning an area. "Our instrument can detect different radioactive isotopes in different places with one exposure," says Ryan. The researchers also developed software to operate the telescope and analyze data in real time.

"Ryan's work is really outstanding, and he has one of the best systems for sensitive, wide-field gamma-ray detection," says NASA's Gehrels. "The detectors can sense sources from afar and use a technique that allows them to see exactly where the source is located." While there are other groups working on similar systems, Gehrels says that the UNH group is leading the field.

Comments

  • Dirty bombs
    If we can detect gamma rays and such from billions of light years away, why couldn't a similar device be mounted in a satellite pointed at the Earth's surface?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    jojo99
    05/05/2009
    Posts:9
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: Dirty bombs
      Detector in a satellite ...  Who says there aren't detectors up there already?
      Rate this comment: 12345

      makornitzky
      05/05/2009
      Posts:11
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      • Re: Dirty bombs
        relax folks....the detectors are already up there, and there are enough of them pointed at "appropriate" areas, in the US and elsewhere.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        Pjazzz
        05/05/2009
        Posts:14
        Avg Rating:
        3/5
  • [no subject]
    The halving distance for a gamma ray in air is no more than 200 meters. In 10 to 20 halving distances the gamma ray source is not detectable. So the range of a detector is about 4000 meters at most. So no satellite can detect a gamma ray source on earth from space. That is the reason why they put gamma ray observatories in orbit in the first place; to get above the earth's atmosphere.  
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Axil
    05/07/2009
    Posts:7
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • Radiation Detection
    Sorry folks they have not repealed 1/radius squared relating to the detection of electromagnetic energy.
    If you read the article you find that the gamma ray telescope is mounted on a terrestrial vehicle (truck). The output from a weapon amount of U-235 is still completely attenuated by an insignificant amount of simple shielding material. Medical Isotopes that could be employed as dirty bomb can be concealed in the interior of a standard shipping container and shielded to the degree that detection would be difficult.
    There are scintillation and solid state gamma ray detection systems currently in use that will rival if not outperform this gamma ray telecsope.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    jguerrier
    05/09/2009
    Posts:1

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Laser-Triggered Chemical Reactions
Featured Content
Sponsored by:
White Papers

Twelve ways to reduce costs with SQL Server 2008
Find out how to reduce costs and get more efficient

Download

Total Economic Impact of SQL Server 2008 Upgrade
Forrester reports on increasing productivity and management capabilities

Download 

Achieving Cost and Resource Savings with UC
How Office Communications Server R2 and Exchange Server can make your business smarter and more efficient

Download 

The Compelling Case for Conferencing
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

How Windows Server 2008 R2 Helps Optimize IT and Save you Money
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V Live Migration
See how Windows Server 2008 R2 and Hyper-V enable virtualization and Live Migration

Download
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.