Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

A Big Stimulus Boost for Electronic Health Records

Continued from page 1

By Emily Singer

Friday, February 20, 2009

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Most physicians have little time or inclination to comparison shop for EHR systems and are ill-equipped to deal with the technology problems likely to crop up when implementing them. "We can't assume every small practice will be able to [install EHRs] on their own," says Farzad Mostashari, an assistant commissioner in the New York City Department of Health who has helped oversee the city's EHR program. "The most effective implementations have been community wide," says Bates. "On their own, people pick too many different programs and make it difficult to exchange information."

In a letter sent to the White House and to Congress last week, a number of physicians and health-care administrators from across the country, including Halamka and Mostashari, urged the incorporation of community-level guidance into the bill. Legislators appeared to have listened, designating funding for regional health-care IT centers that will provide technical and other assistance to area providers. The bill includes funding--via competitive grants--for regional centers that would help relieve this burden by providing best-practice guidelines and technical assistance.

The letter cited two successful examples of community-based deployments: New York's primary-care information project and the Massachusetts eHealth Collaborative. The New York project, launched in 2007, is an effort to bring EHRs to primary-care providers even in the poorest parts of the city. The program provides technical training and support, and will also assess both the economic and health benefits of going digital. "The experience in [Massachusetts and New York] has been nearly 100 percent successful adoption of EHR implementation in the practices that participated," says Harvard Medical School's Halamka.

Community-based efforts are also important to adequately address privacy issues, one of the biggest concerns that have cropped up in response to EHRs."Small practices have no experience with security features," says Mostashari. "We have a privacy lawyer who helps develop privacy practices so providers can take steps to reduce their risk."

He emphasizes that while electronic health records carry some risk--data on thousands of people could be inadvertently or purposely released--there are also benefits, such as being able to audit who accessed a particular chart.

Companies that sell EHRs are already gearing up for the expanding market. "We intend to aggressively ramp up our business," says Girish Kumar Navani, president and cofounder of eClinicalWorks, a Massachusetts-based technology firm that supplied software and support to both the Massachusetts and New York EHR projects. "We're planning to open an office in California and will hire a lot of people there as well."

Comments

  • Records
    Finally, the government is taking over all of healthcare. At last, I can relax.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    millikenrese...
    02/20/2009
    Posts:9
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Government and health care
      I sense sarcasm in your comment. <sarcasm>You know private payer healthcare insurance, and tax incentives to provide it have done so well ensuring most people have access to affordable high quality health care too</sarcasm>
      Rate this comment: 12345

      colinnwn
      02/20/2009
      Posts:43
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
    • Re: Records
      Over half of healthcare is already government funded through Medicare, Medicaid, CHAMPUS, the Veteran's Administration and Indian Health Programs.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      CandidCIO
      03/01/2009
      Posts:3
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
  • [no subject]
    You would think money designated for medical purposes would actually be used in a clinical sense, rather than a bureaucratic office records keeping scheme.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    lasertekk
    02/20/2009
    Posts:78
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re:
      The ARRA specifically specifies that these funds be spent on bureaucratic record keeping, not care.  In reality, the record keeping is built into the care that the government funds today (just like a gallon of gas includes the cost of gas company advertising and other overhead costs). 

      The plan is that the modernization of this record keeping will reduce the .5 trillion dollars the government spends on healthcare each year.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      CandidCIO
      03/01/2009
      Posts:3
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
  • Metadata needs
    Being able to exchange data between information systems requires common metadata -- the descriptions of the meanings of the information that is passed. IT managers know this. Even MDs I have spoken with know this. With common metadata you don't need one giant information system, but independent, cooperating systems from multiple, competing vendors.

    Developing common metadata is not that difficult nor expensive. It requires perhaps a year of workshops, meetings, analysis, drafts, and comments by participants from the medical profession, hospitals, insurance companies, the government health care programs, and information system suppliers. Once the metadata standards are established the systems will evolve naturally.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    robert.hargr...
    02/23/2009
    Posts:27
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • ONCHIT
    A minor correction to the article...the Office of the National Coordinator of Healthcare Information Technology is not created by this bill.  It was established by President George W. Bush in 2003 when he announced his plans to implement interoperable Electronic Health Records in 10 years.  A goal that lost its priority when the administration focused on the war and national security.  The existing National Coordinator, Dr. Kolodner, was appointed by President Bush.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    CandidCIO
    03/01/2009
    Posts:3
    Avg Rating:
    5/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

The Marcellus Shale Gas Rush
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Featured Content
Sponsored by:
White Papers

Twelve ways to reduce costs with SQL Server 2008
Find out how to reduce costs and get more efficient

Download

Total Economic Impact of SQL Server 2008 Upgrade
Forrester reports on increasing productivity and management capabilities

Download 

Achieving Cost and Resource Savings with UC
How Office Communications Server R2 and Exchange Server can make your business smarter and more efficient

Download 

The Compelling Case for Conferencing
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

How Windows Server 2008 R2 Helps Optimize IT and Save you Money
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V Live Migration
See how Windows Server 2008 R2 and Hyper-V enable virtualization and Live Migration

Download
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.