Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Clean-Coal Debut in Germany

A new coal plant is the first to capture and store carbon dioxide.

By Rob Edwards

Friday, September 19, 2008

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

It used to be called stinky town, because the pollution from burning dirty coal was so appalling. But now, if a new pilot plant works, Spremberg, in eastern Germany, could become the birthplace of a clean-coal revolution.

Clean coal: The Vattenfall pilot plant in eastern Germany is the first coal-fired power plant to capture and store its carbon-dioxide emissions. The pilot plant, which has a thermal capacity of 30 megawatts, cost roughly 70 million euros. A larger demonstration-scale plant is scheduled for operation by 2015.
Credit: Vattenfall

Earlier this month, the world's first coal-fired power plant designed to capture and store carbon dioxide that it produces began operations in Spremberg. The pilot plant has been built at a power station that, under Communist rule last century, used to belch out clouds of sulfurous smoke from burning brown coal, or lignite. "Industrial history is being written," says Tuomo Hatakka, chair of the European board of Vattenfall, the Swedish power company behind the new plant. Indeed, the development of carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology is seen by many experts as essential to help the world cut carbon-dioxide emissions in coal-fired power stations.

Vattenfall's small 30-megawatt plant burns the lignite in air from which nitrogen has been removed. Combustion in the resulting oxygen-rich atmosphere produces a waste stream of carbon dioxide and water vapor, three-quarters of which is recycled back into the boiler.

By repeating this process, known as oxyfuel, it is possible to greatly concentrate the carbon dioxide. After particles and sulfur have been removed, and water vapor has been condensed out, the waste gas can be 98 percent carbon dioxide, according to Vattenfall.

The separated carbon dioxide will be cooled down to -28 °C and liquefied. Starting next year, the plan is to transport it by truck 150 miles northwest, to be injected 3,000 meters underground into a depleted inland gas field in Altmark. Ideally, in the future, the gas will be carried by pipeline to underground storage, says Vattenfall.

Compressing and transporting the carbon dioxide takes energy, as does the initial extraction of nitrogen. So these processes reduce the overall efficiency of the plant, although Vattenfall is attempting to counter this by investigating ways of boosting the efficiency of the boiler--by predrying the coal, for example.

Story continues below


The aim, according to the company's vice president, Lars Strömberg, is to develop a power plant with "almost zero" pollution. He says that achieving no emissions will be impossible, "but we will come very, very close to this target."

In an initial three-year testing program, the Schwarze Pumpe pilot plant is expected to assess how components function together and exactly what proportion of carbon dioxide can actually be separated. Using the information gained, Vattenfall plans to scale up to a 300-to-500-megawatt demonstration plant by 2015 and to 1,000-megawatt commercial plants after 2020.

Comments

  • Interested
    While I am not convinced that this solution is one that will be safe in the long-term due to the unknowns surrounding subsurface injection of liquid CO2, I am nonetheless interested because the technology could turn out to be beneficial. 

    I look forward to this plant working over the years with all of the agencies and groups overseeing its progress.  If it fails, at least it'll be a relatively isolated failure in that there aren't many of these operations moving forward.

    I'll remain cautiously optimistic about this form of energy production until the world is able to see and verify data independently.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    bpg131313
    09/19/2008
    Posts:6
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • CO2 used for algae/biofuel feedstock?
    Wouldn't a more practical application of the waste CO2 be for use as feedstock to algae used in biofuel generation?  BOTH electricity generation w/ CO2 capture, AND biofuel production would benefit from this 'clean' process.  I haven't even attempted the math of CO2 available from clean-coal vs algae for bio-fuel demand...so I may be a little off-base.  Either way, I'm just hoping to stir up discussion w/ expert opinion's on this matter.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    jhalter@fost...
    09/19/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: CO2 used for algae/biofuel feedstock?
      Recycling the carbon this way in effect uses solar engery.  The amount of energy should be comparible to the energy released by burning the coal.  I doubt that algae is extremely effecient at this so why not just use the solar power directly?
      Rate this comment: 12345

      TooMany
      09/21/2008
      Posts:47
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      • Re: CO2 used for algae/biofuel feedstock?
        You state that you doubt that algae is extremely efficient at energy conversion.  What information are your doubts based on?   As far as not just using the solar power directly,  the ability to store the solar energy is the same battery technology issue we have with plug in hybrids.  The beautiful thing about fuel creation is its ability to be transported and stored for later use.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        JayDawg
        12/15/2008
        Posts:1
  • Algae oil
    Jhalter bet me to the punch, just think how fast algae would grow in 98% CO2. A full-scale clean coal plant could feed a very large bioreactor. I wonder if that has been their long-term plan from the start. Once all the technical problems are sorted out, you could make a killing selling all the oil.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    zig158
    09/20/2008
    Posts:64
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • old king coal
    Although I am a little late posting to Fridays articles, (I have been a just a little busy in summation), I wonder why so many people are against giving coal, which has such abundant natural reserves and the potential to provide much needed electrical energy, a second look. If, as our other posters say, there is even more potential in CO2 capture to initiate such beneficial chemical reactions, the public should be made aware of the possiblities. The ensuing debate would certainly be interesting.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    phoenix
    09/20/2008
    Posts:172
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • energy losses
    There are visible losses in the system where
    excess heat is removed to cool the steam down.
    The heat, that is left over from steam turbines, should be used with maybe Stirling heat engines. This way the low-grade heat is also converted to mechanical energy  - just a thought ...
    Rate this comment: 12345

    nuubik
    09/22/2008
    Posts:2
    Avg Rating:
    1/5
  • ¢/KWH - solar going to be cheaper?
    ¢/KWH

    Germany and Great Britain are among the most un-economic places, on the earth, for solar.

    http://www.oksolar.com/abctech/images/world_solar_radiation_large.gif

    Even so, is solar going to turn out to be cheaper?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    nekote
    09/22/2008
    Posts:139
    Avg Rating:
    3/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

The Marcellus Shale Gas Rush
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.