Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Guest Blog

Analysis and insight from occasional correspondents and decision makers.

Advertisement
Monday, February 02, 2009

Pond Scum That Makes Fuel Year-Round

Could geothermal heat boost biofuel output?
By Phil McKenna

Algae growing in a heated pond at the University of Nevada test site. Credit: John Bebout

Green algae, or common pond scum, have been held up as a renewable energy panacea. Highly refined strains of the fast-growing biomass can absorb CO2 straight from a power plant's smokestacks, thrive in brackish water, and have the potential to yield far more biofuel per acre than corn does. One promising method of algae production involves nurturing the green goo in decidedly low-tech, open-air ponds. But the approach is plagued by a number of issues, including a fivefold drop in yields in cold winter weather.

Now a team from the University of Nevada has shown that simply cranking up the heat can avoid much of the seasonal production decrease. In late November, John Cushman and his colleagues inoculated an outdoor pond with a "starter" culture of halophytic (salt-loving) algae cells. Since then, they have circulated water heated by natural gas through the pond to keep it at a constant 29 °C (85 °F), despite subzero winter temperatures--an approach that simulates the use of heat from geothermal vents. Three weeks later, they harvested approximately five pounds of algae by dry weight--just half the yield anticipated for summer.

"This will allow us to move from a seasonal crop to optimal production 365 days a year," says Cushman of the potential to combine algae production with geothermal heating. If the scheme proves a success, Nevada could be in a unique position to capitalize. The state is bathed in sunlight, has vast tracks of open desert, and sits on top of little-utilized saline aquifers and geothermal resources.

But even with the addition of geothermal heat, Al Darzins, head of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory's (NREL) recently reinstated algae biofuel research program, questions whether current production methods can be cost competitive. "The price range of algal oil that could currently be produced, from open ponds to closed bioreactors, may be $10 to $40 per gallon," Darzins says. "And that's even before you turn it into fuel."

While geothermal heat might increase production, Darzins says that the added investment could be significant. "You still have to put in pipes to transfer the heat to your algae ponds, and that comes at a cost."

The open-air facilities are also susceptible to contamination by lower-yield strains of algae and other organisms. Darzins says that the highly saline environment--the salinity of the University of Nevada test pond is roughly twice that of seawater--would help limit outside contamination, but he admits that the problem is likely to persist. "What's to say some protozoan that just loves to eat algae might take over the pond? There are ways of preventing their growth, but everything has a cost, and it has to be dirt, dirt cheap."

Comments

  • Tapping hot rocks
    This makes perfect sense when you look at what Greenland does for horticulture with their vast geothermic resources. On a smaller scale the hot springs that run up and down southern california can be used for this farming, but the region only sees small hits of cold weather in the winter time.

    The Hot Springs in San Juan Capistrano (Cleveland National Forest), around Warner Hot Springs (now for sale apparently) and other areas could easily be used for heating up pond scum farms.

    Lake Elsinore sits a few miles away from SJHS and host to some springs themselves could be converted into a farm by piping in the heated water (lots of sulpher) to maintain temperatures and an aquaculture system of designed tanks fed by the hot springs and spring run off may be a boon tothe area.

    The lakebed sits in a low valley that is pretty hot in summer and temperate in winter. Piping in fresh water (or better yet the Grey Water from recycling) would be pretty simple.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    mkogrady
    02/02/2009
    Posts:206
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Tapping hot rocks
        Heat is readily available in the form of 'waste' at existing power plants.  Most of the energy consumed in burning coal or natural gas is given off as heat.   by harnessing this wasted energy, we could increase the efficiency of the resources already being consumed without increasing the environmental burden they represent.  This increased efficiency would decrease the need for additional sources of energy, and could help fill the gap until alternative technologies mature.  No need to access hot springs, lets confine our industrial footprint to areas which have already been degraded.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      deannagay
      02/03/2009
      Posts:5
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
      • Re: Tapping hot rocks
        Here in Tampa, we have sun 11+ months of the year.
        We have brackish lakes and inlets.
        Our phospate industry has an excess of waste that make algea grow, so it must be dumped way out in the gulf.
        Hmmm, sun, lakes, fertilizer in Florida.
        It sure makes sense to do this in NEBRASKA??
        Rate this comment: 12345

        SirLanse
        02/03/2009
        Posts:43
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
Advertisement

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
•  Subscribe
Save 36%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
» Gift Subscription
» Digital Subscription
» Reprints, Back Issues
» Subscribe
» Table of Contents
» MIT News

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.