Monday, February 02, 2009
Pond Scum That Makes Fuel Year-Round
Could geothermal heat boost biofuel output?
By Phil McKenna
 Algae growing in a heated pond at the University
of Nevada test site. Credit: John Bebout |
Green algae, or common pond scum, have been held up as a renewable
energy panacea. Highly refined strains of the fast-growing biomass can
absorb CO2 straight from a power plant's smokestacks, thrive in brackish water,
and have the potential to yield far more biofuel per acre than corn does. One
promising method of algae production involves nurturing the green goo in
decidedly low-tech, open-air ponds. But the approach is plagued by a number of
issues, including a fivefold drop in yields in cold winter weather.
Now a team from the University of Nevada has shown that
simply cranking up the heat can avoid much of the seasonal production decrease.
In late November, John Cushman
and his colleagues inoculated an outdoor pond with a "starter" culture of
halophytic (salt-loving) algae cells. Since then, they have circulated water
heated by natural gas through the pond to keep it at a constant 29 °C (85 °F), despite
subzero winter temperatures--an approach that simulates the use of heat from
geothermal vents. Three weeks later, they harvested approximately five pounds of
algae by dry weight--just half the yield anticipated for summer.
"This will allow us to move from a seasonal crop to optimal
production 365 days a year," says Cushman of the potential to combine algae
production with geothermal heating. If the scheme proves a success, Nevada could
be in a unique position to capitalize. The state is bathed in sunlight, has
vast tracks of open desert, and sits on top of little-utilized saline aquifers
and geothermal resources.
But even with the addition of geothermal heat, Al Darzins,
head of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory's (NREL) recently reinstated algae biofuel research program, questions
whether current production methods can be cost competitive. "The price range of
algal oil that could currently be produced, from open ponds to closed
bioreactors, may be $10 to $40 per gallon," Darzins says. "And that's even
before you turn it into fuel."
While geothermal heat might increase production, Darzins says
that the added investment could be significant. "You still have to put in pipes
to transfer the heat to your algae ponds, and that comes at a cost."
The open-air facilities are also susceptible to
contamination by lower-yield strains of algae and other organisms. Darzins says
that the highly saline environment--the salinity of the University of Nevada test
pond is roughly twice that of seawater--would help limit outside contamination,
but he admits that the problem is likely to persist. "What's to say some protozoan
that just loves to eat algae might take over the pond? There are ways of
preventing their growth, but everything has a cost, and it has to be dirt, dirt
cheap."
Comments
The Hot Springs in San Juan Capistrano (Cleveland National Forest), around Warner Hot Springs (now for sale apparently) and other areas could easily be used for heating up pond scum farms.
Lake Elsinore sits a few miles away from SJHS and host to some springs themselves could be converted into a farm by piping in the heated water (lots of sulpher) to maintain temperatures and an aquaculture system of designed tanks fed by the hot springs and spring run off may be a boon tothe area.
The lakebed sits in a low valley that is pretty hot in summer and temperate in winter. Piping in fresh water (or better yet the Grey Water from recycling) would be pretty simple.
mkogrady
02/02/2009
Posts:206
deannagay
02/03/2009
Posts:5
We have brackish lakes and inlets.
Our phospate industry has an excess of waste that make algea grow, so it must be dumped way out in the gulf.
Hmmm, sun, lakes, fertilizer in Florida.
It sure makes sense to do this in NEBRASKA??
SirLanse
02/03/2009
Posts:43