Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Potential Energy


Kevin Bullis is Technology Review’s energy editor.

Recent Posts

Blog Topics

Recent Comments

  • asogan : Natural gas is normally used for the thermal energy requirements of the plant e.g. process heat...
  • crrick50 : I agree with most of the posts that it is impractical and does not address the human factor. The...
  • nekote : The reason *corn grain ethanol* is heavily dependent on the price of natural gas is because...
  • ... : Eddie:    It is the price of corn ethanol that is 'heavily dependant' on natural gas.   FROM THE...
  • Devere : Kevin, I'm confused about why the price of cellulosic ethanol depends on the price of natural gas...
  • mkogrady : KStauff,  Your comments on separating subsidies and military overhead for securing petroleum in...
  • matlseng : I agree with cutting back the budget for hydrogen fuel cells. They are not economically feasible...
  • kjblack : Old Chinese proverb. "You cant make a silk purse out of a sows ear."
  • mkogrady : I have to be convinced that our involvement is not relate to oil or petroleum. So far it seems...
  • gabrielg01 : Very good post, thank you!   Even if the calculations were to be off, they still make the point.
Advertisement
Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Electric Vehicle Battery-Switching System Unveiled

Startup Better Place demonstrates a system for swapping out depleted batteries for charged ones.
By Kevin Bullis

Better Place, a company based in Palo Alto, CA, that's made deals with numerous governments around the world to install charging infrastructure for electric vehicles, has demonstrated its battery-switch station for the first time. The event took place at 1:30 A.M. ET this morning, in Yokohama, Japan, as part of a government-sponsored exhibit. Japan is studying ways to meet a target of having electric vehicles account for half of all new vehicle sales by 2020.

One thing holding back electric vehicles is their limited range, due to the large size of battery packs and the cost of batteries. A battery-switch station allows drivers to quickly swap out a depleted battery for a charged one. If these were placed at intervals along a highway, they would allow for long-distance trips without stops to recharge the battery, which could take hours. The automatic switching system can swap out a battery in less time than it takes to fill up a gas tank, Better Place says. Other automakers, such as GM and Fisker Automotive, are opting for a different strategy to extend the range of electric vehicles. They include an onboard gas- or ethanol-powered generator to recharge the battery during driving.

Here's a video of the switching station in operation.

Better Place says that the switching station is designed to work with a number of different battery-pack configurations. But many experts warn that, if these stations have to supply too many different types of batteries, they will become too large and costly to be practical. As it is, automakers that are developing electric vehicles are designing custom battery packs for each vehicle, rather than one pack that can work with their own vehicles as well as with those of other manufacturers. Chrysler, for example, recently unveiled five different battery packs.

The switching-station demonstration involved a Nissan Dualis SUV fitted with a battery pack that uses battery cells from A123 Systems, based in Watertown, MA. Better Place has been collaborating with both Nissan and A123, but the company says that production electric vehicles from Nissan won't necessarily look like this.

Comments

  • >>> the project Better Place has NO future >>>
    .

    despite the $160 million raised by Better Place for """its""" project (derived from MY idea of a "cellphoneCAR") the battery-swap concepts have NO future, since new research seems allow a simple and low cost way to recharge slightly modified batteries Li-Ion batteries 100 TIMES FASTER than today's models

    image of the battery swap here: http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/13/video-better-places-automated-electric-vehicle-battery-switch/

    .
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Gaetano Mara...
    05/14/2009
    Posts:120
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    • Re: >>> the project Better Place has NO future >>>
      Disagree. I think that the concept of refuelling as a service has both a history and a future.

      Technology is always changing, but people will still need and want a place to stop after driving x-many kilometers.In time the technological factors will be outstripped by the human factors and if Better Place can be in there as the refuelling technology standard, possibly licensing this 3rd parties, then they are sitting on a good business. They are trying to get out ahead of the game with stations, with a technology(they can adjust that part later)and with their brand.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      horsecrow
      05/15/2009
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
      • Re: >>> the project Better Place has NO future >>>
        I don't see a future in it ever due to battery ownership.  When you first buy your car with a brand new battery, you get great performance.  The first time you swap out at one of these stations you instantly cut down your vehicles range per charge.  Unless the station owns the batteries and vehicles are sold without one this will never take off.  Add to this that auto companies will never agree on a standard battery platform as it destroys their ability to differentiate; they may use the same cell supplier, but the "battery" made up of hundreds of cells will be the way to change the performance of the car
        Rate this comment: 12345

        nickov
        05/15/2009
        Posts:1
        • Re: >>> the project Better Place has NO future >>>
          Good point. I think they could overcome this through memberships. At the time a driver would join, the battery could be assessed, and the entry fee could be adjusted based on the battery age and condition. Then it would be a matter of making sure you had a membership in the service station chains that you liked.

          It would be possible too to have arrangements between different companies such that they track their inventories and charge each other offsetting fees at intervals. This would be similar to the way roaming agreements are made between cell phone companies and ATM machine usage clearing is done today. From the drivers point of view, they would have memberships but would also be able to use other companies in a network for an extra fee of some kind.

          In the end, I agree with those who imagine that the next generation of batteries will have quick recharge times. We are already beginning to see it.
          Rate this comment: 12345

          MakeSense
          05/17/2009
          Posts:93
          Avg Rating:
          3/5
          • Re: >>> the project Better Place has NO future >>>
            You don't need a membership. The swapping station will cover the costs just like the propane exchange stations cover theirs. Each transaction has a rider fee on it to cover the costs and wear of the equipment. Instead of $.60 it will cost $5. Yes it will be cheaper to charge at home. Its a convenience thing just like the propane exchange.

            The swapping companies will monitor the quality/condition of the battery packs and repair/replace as needed. After all you don't need to replace all the cells just the defective ones. This is what the propane exchange companies do. They test, repaint, repair and replace as needed.

            As for battery compatibility, that is up to the companies or the Feds. We currently have compatible small batteries (AAA,AA,C,D, etc.) we should be able to come up with a large battery solution.
            Rate this comment: 12345

            tlynnch
            05/23/2009
            Posts:5
            Avg Rating:
            1/5
  • Why it might work
    I agree with previous posts that swapping your own battery for a used one does not sound reassuring. Therefore a rental system similar to propane gas bottles might work (where there are different sizes available, too). People might also have the option of keeping their own battery at a base close to home and rent one for longer trips. This reminds me of some old pubs in Germany where you can still keep your private favorite beer jug locked away in a small cupboard. If drinking away from your local pub you usually opt for a borrowed glass instead of bringing your own. Better Place will be like the pub owner who doesn't care whether you just take the beer and put it in your own jug or whether you rent one and give it back later, paying a small extra for cleaning and wear. Even fast recharging batteries will need a filling station providing the high power necessary. So if the battery swapping does not take off, by providing the infrastructure for recharching, Better Place will still have a big first mover advantage over the competition.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    SimonHoer
    05/18/2009
    Posts:4
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • Too Impractical
    This is just too impractical.  The consumer won't go for this.  You don't know what the quality of the replacement battery will be. 

    It's unfortunate that Auto companies continue to pour money in these ventures when so many quantum leaps in energy storage are taking place under their noses. 

    Super-Capacitors are real, they're right around the corner, and they will make chemical batteries obsolete.  So why aren't auto manufacturers investing in them?  Probably becuase they're in bed with too many people to do the right thing.  And everyone wonders why they're going bankrupt.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    IHiJump
    05/18/2009
    Posts:2
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
    • Right around the corner?
      Fusion power, with unlimited energy too cheap to meter is right around the corner, and was 20 years ago, and will be 20 years from now!

      So we want a technology that is HERE NOW!
      won't stop them from keeping working on it tho.
      Call us when it's ready
      Rate this comment: 12345

      erbium
      05/27/2009
      Posts:108
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
  • Electirc Battery switching
    I agree with most of the posts that it is impractical and does not address the human factor. The direction of our technology suggests clearly that we need to develop battaries that will satistfy the 200 mile range, charge overnight in your garage and can sustain a quick chargeto 90% in less that 10 minutes. Vhicles like the Tesla Motercars sports car that show this is possible and practical if mass produced. Our efforts need to get there at the big auto industry seem to be overshadowed by the distraction of going in too manty different directions that offer only a short range and little compitition for the Oil industry.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    crrick50
    11/26/2009
    Posts:1
Advertisement

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
•  Subscribe
Save 36%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
» Gift Subscription
» Digital Subscription
» Reprints, Back Issues
» Subscribe
» Table of Contents
» MIT News

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.