Technology Review - Published By MIT
Log in to My.TechnologyReview.com | Register
Advertisement
 

Insights, opinions, and our editors' analysis of the latest in emerging technologies.

Add RSS Feed XML

EPA's Lousy New Nanotech Program

The EPA is starting to do something about the potential hazards of nanomaterials--but not much.
Monday, January 28, 2008
By Kevin Bullis

Some of the unusual properties that make nanomaterials attractive might also cause damage to the environment and human health, but not enough research has been done to know if they do. That's why many experts have been calling for more study of their effects and better regulation of their use. But in spite of rhetoric from government officials, little has been done. So little, in fact, that a toothless program that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced today is worth mentioning. The EPA has started a voluntary reporting program with the laudable goal of finding out what manufacturers already know about the properties of the nanomaterials they make. Surely this is a step in the right direction. But it's happening rather late--years after experts started calling for more attention to nanomaterials. What's more, something as simple and useful as reporting existing data ought to be mandatory. And ultimately, it should be part of a much larger comprehensive program funding research to learn more about nanomaterials and regulate their use. Even for a voluntary program, it's not very good, according to Richard Denison, a senior scientist at Environmental Defense. "EPA is simply 'kicking the can down the road' by shunning approaches that could have delivered needed information faster, and by opting instead to pursue an open-ended approach with no end in sight," he said in a press release. "The lack of clear ground rules governing what information volunteers will be called on to provide means that--even after the initial two-year program runs its course--EPA will still likely have only a partial understanding of what nanomaterials are in production and use, and what is known and unknown about their hazards and the nature of exposures to them."

Comments

  • This is crazy
    ronwagn on 02/12/2008 at 5:39 AM
    Posts:
    10
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    I just lost my brother in law to asbestosis induced lung cancer. I am a Republican, but am wondering if we need a Democrat administration to get some oversight of dangerous new technologies, (and old ones). Some new reports are pointing out the dangers of very small particulates inthe atmosphere.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • EPA and Biofuels are so wrong
    RobinDonald on 07/17/2008 at 2:21 PM
    Posts:
    1
    Nanotechnology can have both positive and negative effects in our future. I would prefer risking our future to entrepreneurs with self motivation, then government oversight bureaucrats, incapable of understanding technology that does not exist, and whose only overall motivation is to go along with what you’re told, so you can get your retirement. While nano companies like Konarka and Nanosolar could make products that have negative consequences, their step by step results speak to the future with powerful answers. Compare that, with the federal mandate of “Biofuel mania” we have been hearing from the scientifcally challenged media and politicians, which, as we all know, is detrimental on all levels. I like to think of the EPA as Nixon’s baby and the democrat’s mama. My take on it, is that whatever unsafe and deadly incidents that may befall us from unregulated inventors and entrepreneurs outweighs the benefits of rapid advancement. I think 25 years of unencumbered work in biotech, nanotech, cybernetics, computer/brain interfaces, uploading, space flight, terraforming, caeliforming, robotics, and artificial general intelligence will stop hunger, ageing, death, pollution, population concerns, and give rise to an exponential increase sensually, intellectually, joyfully and compassionately to everyone. Right now 100,000 people a day die from age related diseases while governmental agencies slow down the progress we need to make to stop this senseless disease called ageing.
    Rate this comment: 12345

Video

Home Tweet Home Twitter's founders talk about the development, implications, and future of their company.
The Next Bubble A Messy Art Your Medical Data Online Who Owns Your Friends? Single Molecule Sequencing
The Next Bubble
A Messy Art
Your Medical Data Online
Who Owns Your Friends?
Single Molecule Sequencing
 
 
The Next Bubble
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review July/August 2008
The Business of Social Networks
The future of the Web is social. But can social-networking sites ever make money?
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology