Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

A Simpler Test for Detecting Down's Syndrome

Continued from page 1

By Courtney Humphries

Friday, February 02, 2007

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Part of the problem, says Ravgen's founder and CEO, Ravinder Dhallan, is that the baby's signal is so low: previous studies had estimated that fetal DNA accounts for a mere 3 percent of DNA in the blood. So the Ravgen group developed a simple way to boost the signal. It believes the mother's DNA is much more abundant because maternal blood cells burst when a blood sample is processed, spilling the woman's DNA into the surrounding plasma. But if the blood sample is treated immediately with formaldehyde, which causes cells to harden, the proportion of fetal DNA in the plasma jumps to about 25 percent.

The scientists at Ravgen then scan the DNA samples for common variations in genetic sequence, called single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). "We look at many variable sites in the mother's DNA and compare it to variable sites in the fetal DNA, and we find sites where mother and the baby differ," Dhallan says. This allows the researchers to piece together two separate genetic signals. They can then compare the level of the fetal signal at chromosome 21 to another chromosome; an abnormally high level indicates an extra copy of chromosome 21.

Dennis Lo, a scientist at the Chinese University of Hong Kong who first discovered fetal-DNA fragments in maternal blood, says that this method and the company's results must be reproduced by other groups, but that the research bodes well for the prospects of a noninvasive prenatal test. He is developing a competing technique that uses pieces of fetal RNA to detect Down's syndrome.

Deborah Driscoll, a reproductive geneticist at University of Pennsylvania who authored the revised guidelines for Down's syndrome testing, says that while current diagnostic tests are accurate, they cannot be performed until 15 weeks into a pregnancy. "People are looking for technological advances that will provide a high detection rate, will be noninvasive, and can be done early in pregnancy," she says.

Comments

  • What is the purpose of DS screening?
    As one who has had 2 children with DS (neither of whom were detected prenatally), I must question the need for having such screenings.  They perpetuate the ignorant idea that there is someting dreadfully wrong with having a child with this chromosonal disability.  Of course, people with DS do have unique challenges. And yet people with this particular disability also are well-known for providing a lot of joy and love to everyone they meet.  The reality is that such screenings often scare new parents into making snap decisions about having to fix the "problem" of having a "defective" child.  Sadly, this often equates to murdering (aka aborting) a child before he or she even has a chance to grow and develop.  Carrying a child with DS (to my knowledge) does not present any imminent danger to the pregnant mother.  DS is typically diagnosed very shortly after the child is born and thus there is still plenty of time to discover and correct any physical problems that might occur (i.e. heart issues, malformed intestines, etc.).  So I must ask in all earnest, what value does such screenings provide?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    ant_dunn
    02/05/2007
    Posts:1

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

The Marcellus Shale Gas Rush
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.