The Ultra BatteryA new type of ultracapacitor could eventually have you throwing out your conventional batteries.
A breakthrough technology is holding forth the promise of charging electronic gadgets in minutes, never having to replace a battery again, and dropping the cost of hybrid cars. Indeed, the technology has the potential to provide an energy storage device ten times more powerful than even the latest batteries in hybrid cars -- while outliving the vehicle itself. The new technology, developed at MIT's Laboratory for Electromagnetic and Electronic Systems, should improve ultracapacitors by swapping in carbon nanotubes, thereby greatly increasing the surface area of electrodes and the ability to store energy. Ultracapacitors, a souped-up version of the capacitors widely used in electronics, have been around for decades. They're well-known for being powerful, that is, able to quickly absorb and release electricity. But they can't store much energy so their stored electricity is depleted in a matter of seconds. As a result, they've been limited to niche applications, such as providing quick bursts of power in some hybrid transit buses. Now researchers at MIT have found what they believe is a way to improve the endurance of ultracapacitors several-fold -- allowing the devices to retain the power and longevity advantages, while storing about as much energy as the batteries used in hybrids. The amount of energy ultracapacitors can hold is related to the surface area and conductivity of their electrodes. The researchers have increased surface area by "more than an order of magnitude" by using carbon nanotubes, says Joel Schindall, professor of electrical engineering at MIT and one of the researchers on the project. One square centimeter of conductive plate when coated with the nanotubes has a surface area of about 50,000 square centimeters, compared with 2,000 square centimeters using the carbon in a commercial ultracapacitor today. The highly pure carbon nanotubes are also extremely conductive, which should increase power output over existing ultracapacitors, the researchers say. The technology may find applications beyond hybrids, too. Ultracapacitors could allow laptops and cell phones to be charged in a minute. And unlike laptop batteries, which start losing their ability to hold a charge after a year or two, they could still be going strong long after the device is obsolete. "Theoretically, there's no process that would cause the [ultracapacitor] to need to be replaced," says professor John Kassakian, another of the researchers. The main hurdle the new technology is likely to face is not technical but economic. "The nanomaterials are probably a hundred or a thousand times more expensive, today, than the materials that we use," says Michael Sund, spokesperson at Maxwell Technologies, San Diego CA, a maker of commercial ultracapacitors. "The markets that we serve are price-enabled. If our product stored a hundred times more energy, but cost a hundred times more, there might not be any market for it." However, the MIT researchers hope that over time, and with help from economies of scale, nanotube ultracapacitors can be made for the same cost as batteries. The next step is to measure the performance of a device using the carbon nanotubes and to grow the nanomaterials on a flexible substrate that can be rolled into a large-scale ultracapacitor. |
Battery Breakthrough -- An Update
02/22/2006









Comments
02/13/2006
Posts:1
02/13/2006
Posts:1
perhaps the thought of people charging their cars for free from the sun has auto manufacturers scared.
02/13/2006
Posts:1
02/13/2006
Posts:1
02/13/2006
Posts:1
02/13/2006
Posts:1
02/13/2006
Posts:1
If you can store electricity you can make their own when possible. Even if 20% of the people who could put in wind or solar did so that would create a great amount of freed up electricity.
Produce the electricity closer to where you use it and forget the long distance transmission loses. Quebec must be nervous right now.
02/13/2006
Posts:1
07/28/2006
Posts:1
esanon
06/24/2008
Posts:1
All depends how energy dense this new battery is. Think 'jump drive' Vs old 'commodore tape drive'!
02/13/2006
Posts:1
02/13/2006
Posts:1
02/13/2006
Posts:1
02/22/2006
Posts:1
08/02/2006
Posts:1
wait till cheap larger scale (houshold size) energy storage becomes available- goodby utilities
politics will hinder no doubt.
02/13/2006
Posts:1
Woof!
02/13/2006
Posts:1
02/13/2006
Posts:1
02/13/2006
Posts:1
02/13/2006
Posts:1
02/13/2006
Posts:1
02/14/2006
Posts:1
02/17/2006
Posts:1
07/29/2006
Posts:1
07/29/2006
Posts:1
F##K NANOTECH, F##K IT RIGHT IN THE EAR--F##K IT IN THE ###HOLE--F##K IT IN THE ANAL RECTUM OF A CAVITY.
F##K NANOTECH.
02/13/2006
Posts:1
02/13/2006
Posts:1
Think about your comments before writing such crap. I think this research has the potential to do a lot of good things!
02/13/2006
Posts:1
02/13/2006
Posts:1
things could get cheaper truely with more research!!
no point in f##king nanotech!!
a good lot might happen if u f##ked ur nasty ,ill informed hole!!!!!!
02/23/2006
Posts:1
02/13/2006
Posts:1
don't be to caught up. enjoy the idea. details are surmountable.
02/13/2006
Posts:1
02/13/2006
Posts:1
BTW, you now drive around with the equivalent of over 100 sticks of dynamite.
02/13/2006
Posts:1
02/13/2006
Posts:1
02/13/2006
Posts:1
02/13/2006
Posts:1
Seriously, take an english class or something.
02/14/2006
Posts:1
02/14/2006
Posts:1
02/18/2006
Posts:1
but it will be so only when we have the basics__the nanotubes and easier methods to make the nanotubes__economical and eco-friendly!!!
no point in robbing jack to pay
jill!!or something like that!!!!
so it is more important to first stick to basics and once everything is ready we can have the revolution!!!
02/23/2006
Posts:1
eestorfan
10/21/2009
Posts:1
no, that would be the petro industry blockading that door.
02/14/2006
Posts:1
03/02/2006
Posts:1
06/03/2006
Posts:1
Another good point was that we won't be using lead or any other harmful, or limited/rare, elements. Although it should be noted that lithium is in no way toxic, and car batteries are recycled by law.
Also, why would we use trucks to transport electricity? Why do you think we have power lines?
klausefluori...
09/01/2006
Posts:1
nano fan
12/04/2006
Posts:1
http://www.alexanderbell.us/Project/GreenElectricity.htm
My Green Electricity (GEL) Initiative, addressing this issue and proposing the solutions, which include the replacement of the Batteries with big (multi-Farad) Capacitors (SuperCap™ or Ultracaps, or PowerCaps, whatever you call tem) in conjunction with alternative renewable primary energy sources, is detailed at:
http://www.alexanderbell.us/Initiative/GEL.htm
Alexander Be...
12/06/2006
Posts:2
1). Single capacitor powers audio mixer, Alexander Bell, USA, EDN, March 14, 1997 (published almost 10 years ago the article introduced a commercial grade Audio electronic solution powered by SuperCap™ and was recognized by EDN’s “Best Design Idea” award) http://www.edn.com/archives/1997/031497/06di_04.htm
2). Muscle power drives battery-free electronics, Alexander Bell, EDN, 11/21/2005 (Describes autonomous, cost-efficient and environmentally-friendly solution utilizing Ultra-capacitor in conjunction with alternative energy sources to power portable electronic equipment)
http://www.edn.com/index.asp?layout=article&articleid=CA6283833
Alexander Be...
12/06/2006
Posts:2
It's a brand new product, so it needs to go through independent testing to see just how well it performs, but even if it does not prove to be useful for automotive applications, it is almost sure to be a boon for home and industrial applications for storing energy during the day produced by solar panels, to be used at night.
One of the exciting aspects of EEStor's ultracap is that it does not leak down quickly like is usually the case with capacitors and ultracapacitors... batteries have always been better at that... but if EEStor is right, this ultracap can be charged and will still retain its charge months later.
Since EEStor's ultracap would be competing in the same market as the MIT ultracap above, I'm surprised there is not yet a link from this page to that one. I ache for the day we can all dump the gas guzzling, polluting, noisy, inefficient internal compustion engine in favor of an inexpensive, safe EV with good range, quick charging, and long lifespan.
Until this webpage is linked with the EEStor page, here is the site addy:
http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/18086/
Keep your fingers crossed, everybody. This just might be our Holy Grail.
billdale
01/26/2007
Posts:15
getmehi
12/09/2007
Posts:1