Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

A New Competitor to LCD

Continued from page 1

By Prachi Patel

Monday, July 21, 2008

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

The new pixels use two tiny micromirrors to pass or block light. The first is a 100-micrometer-wide, 100-nanometer-thick aluminum disc with a hole in the center. The other mirror, also a thin aluminum film, is as big as the hole and placed directly in front of it. Light is projected on the disc-shaped mirror from behind the second mirror.

In the "off" state, both mirrors reflect light back to the source, so nothing comes out of the hole. In the "on" state, a voltage applied between the disc and a transparent electrode bends the disc toward the electrode. Now, light bounces off the disc toward the second mirror and then out through the hole.

Sinclair and his colleagues fabricate the pixels in a layered fashion similar to that of silicon chip fabrication. He says that the telescopic pixel design is simpler than the design of an LCD, with fewer layers, so the fabrication would require fewer steps. Right now, the researchers use indium titanium oxide, the industry standard for making transparent electrodes. But they suggest making the electrodes with an extremely thin, patterned aluminum layer that would be nearly transparent. This could simplify the display's production process and decrease its cost even more.

The new pixel technology has advantages over current LCDs, says Peruvemba, but the mechanical parts might compromise robustness. "There are literally hundreds of thousands to millions of little shutterlike devices that have a mechanical movement," he says. "In most devices, what fails first are the mechanical parts."

While LCD and the new telescopic display transmit light from a backlight, others have come up with promising pixels that reflect ambient light. Qualcomm's new display, which has MEMS-based pixels, is set to debut this year on three different cell phones. (See "E-Paper Displays Video.") The company has also announced its first color screen for an MP3 player. Meanwhile, E Ink, which sells black-and-white e-paper displays, has now made color and video prototypes. (See "E-Paper Comes Alive.") The e-paper technologies have a niche market: low-power screens for outdoor use.

These displays do not need a backlight, and their pixels do not need the constant refreshing required in an LCD, which slashes their power use. And the more light, the better the screens look. "We're not competing with bright ambient light--we're taking advantage of all that sunlight," says Brian Gally, director of engineering at Qualcomm MEMS Technologies. "So it's really analogous to paper."

Sinclair says that Microsoft Research is targeting large, low-cost computer screens. That could be an IT worker's dream. Instead of having a small desktop monitor on which you have to switch between windows, a techie could have a "whiteboard-sized thin screen" to work on, Sinclair says.

Comments

  • RGB LEDs
    Well if you have an array of RGB LEDS that you can switch on and off rapidly and individually then you don't NEED an LCD or any other kind of screen in front of it. The LEDs ARE the screen (eg an OLED screen) so I don't know how they can put this forward as an advantage of the new technology and it makes me skeptical when I read such claims.

    EDIT:
    Oh, I see now that the LEDs are probably a single light source backlighting the entire screen and the display itself modulates the individual pixels. OK, I spoke too soon!
    Rate this comment: 12345

    bkf11
    07/21/2008
    Posts:7
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • Lifespan
    Since there is to much mechanics involved lifespan would be considerably less than LCD.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    emilius
    07/21/2008
    Posts:4
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Lifespan
      This is probably a positive factor in rushing them to market. Anything to get us "consumers" to buy more crap, and to hell with the environment or anything else that stands in the way of Profit. It's called Planned and Perceived Obsolescence.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      bj
      07/21/2008
      Posts:37
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
    • Re: Lifespan
      Wear occurs differently at microscopic scales. Similar micromirrors are used in digital light projector systems, and don't wear out over time periods where it matters...the parts are small enough that they never deform beyond the point where they can return completely to their original state. The flexing parts can even be smaller than the grain structure of the metal they're made of, if they're even made of metal in the first place.

      The main issue I see is fabrication. LCD manufacture boils down to depositing a few patterned films on a glass surface. Building microelectromechanical displays of any sort will require more complex etching processes and more trips between etching and deposition processes. More expensive chemicals consumed, more time spent on the machinery, more production losses due to slight misalignments or other errors during processing. The technology might be superior, but I don't see it replacing LCDs.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      cjameshuff2
      07/21/2008
      Posts:14
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      • Re: Lifespan
        I do not see this as competitive for small displays, OLED's are almost there, and for larger displays, I have a hard time believing that photolitographic micromachining of MEMS micromirrors to be "cost effective" compared to LCD and other emerging technologies.  Unless they've invented some roll-to-roll MEMS or some super cheap process that can hold the geometry tolerances and material properties with extreme repeatability I am not holding my breath.  This is Microsoft we are taking about after all.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        gupta
        07/22/2008
        Posts:6
        Avg Rating:
        3/5
  • If it works, I'll buy
    Hey, if they can make it as cheap or cheaper and brighter than LCD's, I'll buy it ... as long as it's not attached to a windoze machine that is.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    GaryB
    07/21/2008
    Posts:64
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • Contacting Reporter
    I have some additional questions regarding this article. Does anyone know how to email or get in touch with the reporter?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    AshleyCJohns...
    07/21/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    1/5
    • Re: Contacting Reporter
      Hi AshleyCJohnson,

      I can get in touch with the reporter for you. Please send me an email with your questions and I will forward them to her as I cannot hand out her information. email: brittany.sauser@technologyreview.com

      Thanks,
      Brittany
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Brittany Sau...
      07/31/2008
      Posts:32
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
  • If it updates current LCD tech, fine...
    ...but my bets are still on OLED's. Perfect blacks, no backlight, no blur.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    echoelman
    07/22/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
    • Re: If it updates current LCD tech, fine...
      .. and since it organic, pixel life will be shorter as well ;)
      To be honest, I think I'd sooner 'protect' my money by buying the new competitor than by going for OLED (which I think will be great for keyboards etc, but not for anything over 15").

      Time will tell, though I like the sound of having a 40+" display for the price of a current 17" LCD display :P
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Manuvidya
      08/01/2008
      Posts:19
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
  • better and already advanced
    there is an outfit called "unipixel" that has a tie-up with Philips. Their system switches in 2 micro seconds... yes milionths of a sec.
    it's much simpler, cheaper, well into prototype, lets 60% of the light through and uses standard LCD fabrication... check out the website... so who wants Microsoft?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    godricbj
    07/22/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    2/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Laser-Triggered Chemical Reactions
Featured Content
Sponsored by:
White Papers

Twelve ways to reduce costs with SQL Server 2008
Find out how to reduce costs and get more efficient

Download

Total Economic Impact of SQL Server 2008 Upgrade
Forrester reports on increasing productivity and management capabilities

Download 

Achieving Cost and Resource Savings with UC
How Office Communications Server R2 and Exchange Server can make your business smarter and more efficient

Download 

The Compelling Case for Conferencing
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

How Windows Server 2008 R2 Helps Optimize IT and Save you Money
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V Live Migration
See how Windows Server 2008 R2 and Hyper-V enable virtualization and Live Migration

Download
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.