|
Friday, April 18, 2008 Boeing's Composite ProblemStructural weakness forces Boeing to retrofit the 787 Dreamliner. By David Talbot
Boeing says that its 787 Dreamliner--a midsize, fuel-efficient passenger jet that is currently in development--will be the first commercial aircraft in which major structural elements are made of composite materials rather than aluminum alloys. The changes are expected to slash component weights 20 percent, significantly boosting fuel efficiency. Such composite materials--layers of superstrong carbon fibers and epoxy--have long been used in military jets, where money is rarely an object, and in commercial jets for parts like luggage-rack frames. But Boeing is learning how hard composites can be to analyze effectively and build economically for commercial jet structures. The company has had to delay the 787's introduction because elements of the composite-made wing box--the major structure inside each wing--buckled in stress tests. The wing box begins in roughly the middle of the plane and extends about two-thirds of the wingspan. This key component--more than 15 meters long and 5 meters wide--was designed and built by Boeing together with Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and Fuji Heavy Industries, in Japan. Pat Shanahan, vice president for the 787 program, said in a conference call last week that structural testing had "identified the need to stiffen elements within the center wing box." The fix requires adding new brackets and other parts to wing boxes already built, as well as modifying the design of boxes not yet built. The retrofits of existing boxes will intrude into wiring pathways, compounding the problems. So Boeing is pushing back the 787's delivery date about six months, from the first quarter to the third quarter of 2009. The issue with composites isn't that they aren't strong; it's that they are so internally complex. They consist of layers oriented in different directions; those layers, in turn, are made of individual fibers that may vary somewhat in composition. This makes it difficult for engineers to accurately mimic their performance in computer models for premanufacture testing. "Composite materials are more difficult to analyze than simple homogenous metals," says John Hansman, director of the International Center for Air Transportation, at MIT. "You generally don't model every fiber in the structure, so you come up with models that have simplifications." |
The Ascent of the Robotic Attack Jet
03/01/2005



Comments
lasertekk on 04/18/2008 at 10:39 AM
19
mbloore on 04/18/2008 at 2:14 PM
20
which is not to say that we know every place to look.
Shiladie on 04/20/2008 at 2:20 PM
36
gabrielg01 on 04/21/2008 at 8:47 PM
298
Stay away from this airplane for the next 3-5 years, until they fix the bugs in it. It's like Windows Vista, except a crash has a different meaning.
dgholstein on 04/29/2008 at 10:45 PM
2
Let's hope everyone involved (manufacturer, airlines, FAA) starts on a regular inspection program to see how the materials age, through time and regular use.
...Dan
rodbennet on 05/14/2008 at 1:18 PM
2
For more information on an integrated approach to real life composite behaviour (mechanical stress including hygrothermal ageing conditions) the following web forums have been quite useful to me:
-integrated forum on composite properties
-diffusion and corrosion properties of composites
Regards,
Rodney