|
Thursday, March 06, 2008 Whale-Inspired Wind TurbinesContinued from page 1 By Tyler Hamilton
Already, attempts are being made to incorporate the tubercle design into commercial products. Fish is president of a venture based in Toronto, Ontario, called WhalePower, which has begun demonstrating the advantages of tubercles when they're integrated into the leading edges of wind-turbine and fan blades. Prototypes of wind-turbine blades (see image below) have shown that the delayed stall doubles the performance of the turbines at wind speeds of about 17 miles per hour and allows the turbine to capture more energy out of lower-speed winds. For example, the turbines generate the same amount of power at 10 miles per hour that conventional turbines generate at 17 miles per hour. The tubercles effectively channel the air flow across the blades and create swirling vortices that enhance lift.
WhalePower, based in Toronto, Ontario, is testing this wind-turbine blade at a wind-testing facility in Prince Edward Island. The bumps, or "tubercles," on the blade's leading edge reduce noise, increase its stability, and enable it to capture more energy from the wind. Stephen Dewar, director of research and development at WhalePower, says that ongoing tests at the Wind Energy Institute of Canada, in the province of Prince Edward Island, have shown the tubercle-lined blades to be more stable, quiet, and durable than conventional blades. "The turbine has survived being hit by the edge of a hurricane, and it survived wind-driven snow and ice," he says. WhalePower has also shown in demonstrations that tubercle-lined blades on industrial ceiling fans can operate 20 percent more efficiently than conventional blades can, and they do a better job at circulating air flow in a building. The results were dramatic enough to convince Canada's largest maker of ventilation fans to license the design, which will appear in a new line of products scheduled for release at the end of April. "This licensing agreement with the fan company is great," says Fish. "It basically shows one of the many potential applications for this technology. The union of biology and engineering through biomimetics will make future innovations possible." The Harvard study reaches the same conclusion. "It is possible that the lessons learned from humpback-whale flippers will soon find their way into the design of special-purpose wings, hydrofoils, as well as wind turbine and helicopter blades." |
Audio »
Share »
Digg this
Add to del.icio.us
Add to Reddit
Add to Facebook
Slashdot It!
Stumble It!
Add to Newsvine
Add to Connotea
Add to CiteUlike
Add to Furl
Googlize this
Add to Rojo
Add to MyWeb
Favorite
Print
E-mail
Wind Power Moves into Deep Waters
06/04/2008
Comments
nucinc on 03/06/2008 at 7:53 AM
1
tadswana on 08/05/2008 at 5:34 AM
1
I'm discussing this in further detail on my blog:
windmeup
rgmason on 03/06/2008 at 11:10 AM
1
Vortex generators and stall fences have been attached to the leading edge of wings on airplanes for years.
http://www.centennialofflight.gov/essay/Theories_of_Flight/Transonic_Wings/TH20G6.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vortex_generator
Randy Mason
olmon on 03/06/2008 at 2:48 PM
7
mapson4 on 03/11/2008 at 8:56 PM
1
Stephen Dewar on 03/11/2008 at 5:32 PM
1
Tubercles deliver comparable benefits but they are far from identical. First, there is no structural fence. Rather, turbulent streams generated in the intertubercular channel act like virtual fences as they transit the back 60% of chord. Also, very unfence-like, these air flow streams have been accellerated by the channel's shape which works like an air-capped venturi chamber. Similarly, I don't think any known vortex generator produces a flow pattern comparable to the very slow sinuous vorticity produced behind the bumps nor can it match its exceptional attachment. In fact, only the airflow over the root resembles a conventional laminar flow.
The more you know about Tubercle technology, the more you understand that this is not a new design for an airfoil: It is literally a new KIND of airfoil.
Stephen W. Dewar
VP Business Affairs & Director of R&D
WhalePower Corporation
27 Tyrrel Avenue
Toronto, ON M6G 2G1
(tel) 416-651-7559 (fax) CALL FOR CONNECTION
stephen.dewar@whalepower.com
floundericiousWA on 03/12/2008 at 3:04 PM
2
This was very exciting to read...I had a couple of questions for you regarding the topic of vortex generators/stall fences and the use of "tubercles" on these fan blades:
1) Is there any similarity between this and the trend of Formula One teams using serrated and stepped leading edges on turning vanes?
For a number of years, now, the leading F1 teams have used stepped upper edges on bargeboards and serrated leading edges on their underbody panels to reduce stall sensitivity and improve performance throughout the operating envelope.
2) In your comment about the Harvard tests (edit: excuse me, that would be the U.S. Naval Academy tests), you make mention of a reduction in drag by 32% and increase in lift of 8%... Was this at the high AoAs you noted just before this or at a neutral AoA?
Thanks!
Patrick
mkogrady on 03/06/2008 at 11:30 AM
93
Can't we just copy perfection?
Em on 03/06/2008 at 11:47 AM
9
We are too simplistic and limted to copy most things. We do get inspired and most things we created are inspired by nature. That's all we know. Think of a bird's or whale's brain and the adaptive control that comes with it and compare it to a turbine or cockpit controller... There is a huge gap there!!!
mkogrady on 03/07/2008 at 12:59 PM
93
Shiladie on 03/10/2008 at 2:15 PM
36
honzik on 03/06/2008 at 12:34 PM
4
RD on 03/06/2008 at 1:49 PM
50
Why was no mention of increased or decreased drag mentioned?
sterlingda on 03/06/2008 at 7:52 PM
1
Here's our independent coverage:
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:WhalePower_Corp
The company website is http://whalepower.com
DJTal on 03/07/2008 at 3:19 AM
116
pkassebaum on 03/07/2008 at 2:38 AM
5
Theoretical predictions are validated by experiments, not the other way around. Such a misunderstanding of science perpetuated the ridiculous claims of Aristotle and St. Thomas Aquinas.
andrewm on 03/07/2008 at 7:31 AM
1
floundericiousWA on 03/12/2008 at 3:14 PM
2
I've heard many different versions of this, but here's my $0.02...others should certainly jump in.
It reflects approaching a physical problem or question from two different directions:
1) Deductive - you observe behavior in a physical system and take measurements about the surroundings, the environment, and the interactions. You then attempt to deduce the cause of the behavior from that data and use controlled experiments to validate your understanding of the relationships between the system, surroundings, environment, etc.
2) Inductive - you start from a theoretical model and basic equations, then design a theoretical system of constrations and interactions. You design tests and experiments to validate the assumptions and constraints in your theoretical model and refine your understanding of the system.
It's two sides of the same coin, but I'd submit it as proof that while you can start with one or the other, you eventually need at least some of both (experimental observation and theoretical induction) to develop the body of knowledge that defines a physical system. It sounds like they've done it here and there' some substantial benefit to be had in airfoil design!
rabbit87 on 03/08/2008 at 2:53 AM
1
That "bump" i guess its because it is a "muscles". Somemore if one follow the design of a whale, it will be very dangerous. Cos u fly up then down.
o ya
muscles contract and relax. If one can make the wings of an airplane like that. That would be wonderful. Somemore its flight is because of a wonderful thrust while it is in the water and it lost it while in the air and thats why it falls back down.
Winds changes its form easily. If someone really want to improve it then the wings able to adapt to its surrounding just like that cute little big whale. The wings can be change due to weather and pressure difference and its soft. can change its shape by little though but at least it does change.
for the nowadays flying tech i guess its very nice already. but why not make it with different design.. Whale gave idea not on tech but rather the design more. It would be cute to see a whale flying on the sky.
shomas on 03/23/2008 at 6:47 AM
20
Siphon on 03/29/2008 at 11:27 AM
94
- Wind would be much cheaper, even in areas with lower wind resources, as output would increase dramatically but costs wouldn't rise a lot. Although, for the time being, they may licence/sell their technology for a serious premium ;)
- Tubercles could be integrated in new designs fairly easily and quickly, and older windmills could even be retrofitted with new tubercle blades.
- CAES is already the cheapest method for bulk energy storage, and the majority of the US and many other countries as well have suitable geology for developing the resevoir/aquifer.
- Compressors and expanders used in CAES could be significantly more efficient but again not much more expensive, increasing the round trip efficiency of CAES, making it cheaper.
The development of cost-effective no-fuel CAES such as AACAES would make the scheme even more attractive.
Considering how poorly wind power correlates with electrical demand, it could make sense to bypass the electrical generator in the windmill altogether, replacing it with a compressor. Large wind parks of say at least a few GW each, would all have their own large resevoir. The windmills directly charging the compressed air storage resevoir. It saves the cost of expensive electrical generators, and could also have the advantage of being able to exploit the strongest winds, which is problematic for electrical generators but easier with more robust compressors. Especially because, with tubercles, the blades would be stronger so they could also take stronger winds.
If what they claim is true, then this could be the most important breakthrough for wind in years.
DaveNate on 07/16/2008 at 10:21 AM
1
Roy One on 08/01/2008 at 6:57 PM
1
Adaptable wings? already being researched using electro morphing material to alter the camber of the wings to match the speed.
There's always the under-exploited aerodynamics of delta wings. Better at slower speeds. Different to normal wings and not just streched out and chopped to fit into a Mach cone either.
I always fancied a simple single blade wind turbine based entirely on a sycamore seed. Cheap and the best aerodynamics known afaik.
Just read the note on the effect of the nodules being found 60% back down the flipper. Maybe this is the same as the attached vortex in delta wings..?..