|
Friday, May 11, 2007 Solar Power at Half the CostA new roof-mounted system that concentrates sunlight could cut the price of photovoltaics. By Kevin Bullis
A new mechanism for focusing light on small areas of photovoltaic material could make solar power in residential and commercial applications cheaper than electricity from the grid in most markets in the next few years. Initial systems, which can be made at half the cost of conventional solar panels, are set to start shipping later this year, says Brad Hines, CTO and founder of Soliant Energy, a startup based in Pasadena, CA, that has developed the new modules. Concentrating sunlight with mirrors or lenses on a small area cuts the costs of solar power in part by reducing the amount of expensive photovoltaic material needed. But while concentrated solar photovoltaic systems are attractive for large-scale, ground-based solar farms for utilities, conventional designs are difficult to mount on rooftops, where most residential and commercial customers have space for solar panels. The systems are typically large and heavy, and they're mounted on posts so that they can move to track the sun, which makes them more vulnerable to gusts of wind than ordinary flat solar panels are. Soliant has designed a solar concentrator that tracks the sun throughout the day but is lighter and not pole-mounted. The system fits in a rectangular frame and is mounted to the roof with the same hardware that's used for conventional flat solar panels. Yet the devices will likely cost half as much as a conventional solar panel, says Hines. A second-generation design, which concentrates light more and uses better photovoltaics, could cost a quarter as much. He says that a more advanced design should be ready by 2010. The Soliant design combines both lenses and mirrors to create a more compact system. Each module is made of rows of aluminum troughs, each about the width and depth of a gutter. These troughs are mounted inside a rectangular frame and can tilt in unison from side to side to follow the sun. Each trough is enclosed on top with a clear acrylic lid. Inside each trough, a strip of silicon photovoltaic material runs along the bottom. As light enters, some of it reflects off the inside surface of the trough and reaches the strip of silicon. The rest of the incoming light is focused on the strip by a lens incorporated into the acrylic lid. As a solar concentrating system, this design has a few drawbacks. Because the troughs are mounted close together, they shade each other during parts of the day, decreasing the total amount of electricity produced. They can also only track from side to side, which makes it impossible for them to follow exactly the arc of the sun across the sky. This second problem will be addressed in the second-generation design, in which each trough will be divided into sections, each of which can pivot from side to side and also up and down. |


Comments
nekote on 05/11/2007 at 7:36 AM
115
Always the key question.
The delivered price of the energy.
Higon Lee on 03/31/2008 at 4:51 AM
3
Higon Lee on 03/31/2008 at 4:55 AM
3
I want to know the price of module.
Thanks,
nov.1118 on 05/21/2008 at 7:21 PM
1
minkram on 06/21/2008 at 4:00 AM
1
halcorn on 05/11/2007 at 8:31 AM
1
kearns on 05/11/2007 at 9:57 AM
25
tonycecala on 05/11/2007 at 11:47 AM
2
kearns on 05/11/2007 at 2:04 PM
25
gildwal on 05/12/2007 at 6:00 PM
1
nekote on 05/12/2007 at 12:52 PM
115
Intense concentrators, like www.greenandgoldenergy.com.au's 500:1 fresnel lens system, absolutely have to have a method to dissipate that tremendous thermal load, otherwise the silicon PV "melts". Essentially, they're deliberately using the aluminum structure as a heat sink to disipate that heat.
Using water sounds great.
But water always has the potential leakage issue.
A bigger deal because of the proximity of electrical devices.
Worse yet, at these heat / potential temperature levels, there is the danger of a steam explosion.
An all too real and really seriously bad thing.
Probably have to have a wicked good safety system.
Or some sort of elegant / cool totally failsafe passive intermediary heat transfer system.
FarhadA on 05/14/2007 at 4:36 AM
1
There are several German companies who combine the 2 technologies in a very interesting way. I don't remember the name but I have seen several installation of this type here in south of France where I live.
Best regards,
/Farhad
solarbob on 05/15/2007 at 2:54 AM
2
If you really need hot water, the tradeoff may be worthwhile. But in many cases, it may be actually be more cost effective to install separate PV and solar hot water systems.
ytterbius on 07/12/2007 at 11:49 PM
1
Check out the webpage http://www.aer-online.com/splash.phtml
It's a paper magazine, and I don't know if you'll actually be able to get this particular article anymore, but it's free, and if you're into this stuff might be worth getting.
Elroch on 08/09/2007 at 7:42 PM
28
mbloore on 05/11/2007 at 8:25 PM
20
so the roof will actually stay a bit cooler.
aymeric on 05/14/2007 at 9:11 AM
15
jaller on 06/10/2007 at 4:54 AM
1
The purpose of a refrigerator is to remove heat from an interior chamber. If you try to attach something to the hot area at the back of the fridge (for producing electricity), that would increase the thermal resistance and make it harder for the fridge to do its job of getting rid of heat from the inside compartment. The fridge would have to consume additional electricity, more than you would be able to produce.
As for the oven, it is possible to use it to generate electricity, but since you want the appliance to reach and maintain a nice high temperature (for cooking your food), I think the best choice would be to get an oven which is more insulated. That way, the oven would be losing heat (to the kitchen environment) more slowly, and it would require less energy to maintain the high temperature and cook your food. IF, after you finish cooking, you could attach some system which would cool your oven and produce electricity in the process, that might be worthwhile, but I think that the cost of such a system would be much higher than the value of the small amount of electricity it could produce.
Summary: Don't use your household appliances to make electricity. Buy more efficient appliances.
cassamm on 06/24/2007 at 11:43 AM
1
As it circulates this mix cools the PV cells and transfers the solar heat into the heat sink being the in-house hotwater tank, via a heat exchanger.
This then implies the auto industry absorbing the solar sector. After all in the manufacturing context the generic solar hotwater systems are the assembly of the car's windscreen, radiator, plumbing and related components. Which is why Toyota and Fiat are the biggest manufacturers of solar hot water heaters in Japan and Italy respectively.
For them to incorporate the PV panels is the logical next step.
asdar on 05/11/2007 at 8:32 AM
62
Still, even with that, this is a fantastic development. I hope when they say it's comparable with grid, they mean without subsidies.
Higon Lee on 03/31/2008 at 5:02 AM
3
karlhedderich on 05/11/2007 at 9:42 AM
9
kjblack on 05/14/2007 at 3:10 AM
3
No one asks about EROI when they buy an automobile, truck, flat screen television, surround sound system.
The solar system adds value to the property it is being installed on so that has be an incentive to purchase the unit.
Elroch on 08/09/2007 at 7:46 PM
28
Secondly, modern photovoltaics do have a positive EROI, but it does take a long time to break even.
bkshilo on 05/11/2007 at 2:20 PM
15
paultz on 05/11/2007 at 3:04 PM
1
for a similar australian invention (the suncube)
website contains
a detailed discussion of the issues and economics
nekote on 05/12/2007 at 12:25 PM
115
A post mounted system, versus this "flat" "roof" system.
An obvious potential competitor to this system.
Jeff on 05/12/2007 at 5:29 AM
3
Silacon on 05/12/2007 at 12:43 PM
37
Charles G. Nutter, CEO Silacon.com
rhapsodyinglue on 05/13/2007 at 8:44 PM
55
If I were to consider putting one of these on my roof, it certainly doesn't seem easy to figure out what the real average output would be over a year.
carlp on 05/14/2007 at 12:28 PM
1
http://solfocus.com/technology.html
And Energy Innovations which has the SunFlower that fulfills the dreams of an earlier poster about using heat energy in a heat engine as well as visible energy in a PV cell.
http://www.energyinnovations.com/sunflower.html
slapstick on 05/14/2007 at 2:59 PM
1
I hear EI is coming out with a new design, but if its anything like the sunflower it has about zero chance of succeeding. Solfocus has some promise, I think they are still a lot further from commercial production though. We'll see.
solarbob on 05/15/2007 at 2:40 AM
2
That said, the two products (SolFocus and Soliant) really serve different markets. The Soliant product targets flat roofs, whereas the SolFocus product targets applications where a pole mount is acceptable.