Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Will Cellulosic Ethanol Take Off?

Continued from page 1

By Kevin Bullis

Monday, February 26, 2007

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Other companies are planning to build plants, but these are also relatively small. Range Fuels (formerly Kergy), based in Broomfield, CO, plans to start construction this year on a 10-million-gallon-per-year plant in Georgia, CEO Mitch Mandich says. A large corn-grain ethanol company, Abengoa Bioenergy, of St. Louis, is building a 1.3-million-gallon biomass ethanol plant in Spain. But even taken together, these plants will supply only a tiny fraction of the 15-billion-gallon target.

"That's a huge goal," says John Howe, vice president of public affairs at Celunol. "That's well beyond what any one company or a large number of companies [can do]. It will take a massive national effort to get close to that goal."

By "national effort," he partly means money for loan guarantees that will encourage financiers to fund the building of large commercial-scale plants. Company executives and cellulosic-ethanol advocates agree on the need for such government help. Iogen Corporation, in Ottawa, Canada, is a case in point. The company has been producing cellulosic ethanol since 2004 and already has an almost 700,000-gallon-per-year demonstration plant. But Iogen's plans for a 20-million-gallon commercial-scale plant are now on hold as the company awaits legislation to be passed in Canada, the United States, or Germany that will provide the financial incentives Iogen needs to build such a big operation.

Yet financing may not be the only hurdle: even if commercial plants can be built, the process may still prove too expensive to compete with corn ethanol, so further work in the lab may be necessary. (See "Redesigning Life to Make Ethanol.")

Indeed, researchers at cellulosic-ethanol companies, national labs, and academic labs are engaged in continuing R&D both in converting biomass into ethanol and in growing more-productive strains of biomass. Right now the conversion is an expensive and water-intensive multistage process. Some groups hope to genetically engineer a single organism to both break down cellulose into simpler sugars and ferment alcohols, thereby simplifying the process. Others are working to improve methods for converting biomass into ethanol using heat and catalysts--the method being used by Range Fuels. And companies such as Celunol are investigating better crops, such as the ancestors of today's sugarcane, that can produce more ethanol per acre.

Some researchers have even given up on the idea of cellulosic ethanol, turning instead to sources such as algae for biofuels. (See "Algae-Based Fuels Set to Bloom.") But Nathanael Greene, an energy-policy specialist at the NRDC, remains optimistic. Although he thinks it's unlikely that cellulosic-ethanol plants will produce more than a few billion gallons of fuel by 2017, "that would put us in the position where the cellulosic industry is really ready to start growing exponentially," he says. "Once we get over that first hump, I think the cellulosic industry will grow quite rapidly, and [it] has much greater longer-term growth potential [than corn ethanol]."

Greene cites the example of the now fast-growing corn-ethanol industry. "It took 10 years to get the first billion gallons and 10 years to get the second billion," he says. "And now we're set to go from 6 to roughly 12 billion in 18 months."

Comments

  • Yes...It will take off.  Fasten your seatbelts.
    In 1995 someone asked me if I thought the Internet would take off.  A year later, the columnist from Dear Abby said that the Interet was only for young men who have too much time and can't get girlfriends.

    I find it interesting that the folks who helped build the Internet, like Vinod Kholsa (and even Al Gore) are very bullish about Cellulosic Ethanol.  Other respected minds like Richard Branson and Alan Greenspan are also touting Cellulosic Ethanol.  If you look at where the technology and industry was a couple years ago, you might say that Cellulosic Ethanol has already taken off.  It's moving so fast, it is very hard to keep track of it.  Sites like <a href="http://www.InvestInCellulosicEthanol.com"> www.InvestInCellulosicEthanol.com </a> and the Energy Blog are the only ways I've been able to keep up.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    m_albertson
    02/26/2007
    Posts:4
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: Yes...It will take off.  Fasten your seatbelts.
      The planet is packed with humans and still growing expotentially. Ethanol as a fuel component will, I agree, start to grow rapidly. The total infrastructure will begin blossoming from fuel plant production, transportation, and finally the fueling station.  Indy 500 racers use methanol, which would no doubt, be a small percentage of ethanol.  It is a brave new world.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      infidel2
      02/27/2007
      Posts:2
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
  • Could this affect the soil fertility
    Since all straw, chips, and stems will be collected to be used in ethanol generation process, I think soil will loose a lot of its elements which will cause continuous decrements in the soil fertility to the level that it can't produce goods anymore.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    ahmedj
    02/26/2007
    Posts:3
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    • Re: Could this affect the soil fertility
      I agree. This could definitely affect soil fertility. One way to sequester carbon and replenish lost soil nutrients could occur with the addition of biochar. Johannes Lehmann at Cornell has quite a bit on his website about "terra preta". There is also a company called EPRIDA that I think my have a worthy technology to combat soil depletion.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      concerned1
      02/26/2007
      Posts:3
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      • Re: Could this affect the soil fertility
        Soil fertility is an issue with corn production.  If woody biomass is the dominant feedstock for Ethanol, then it's likely to be less of an issue.  But the idea of removing even some of the corn stover from the field as woody biomass for cellulosic Ethanol is, IMHO, a mistake. Carbon is as important for maintaining fertility as any other component.  There's a worse problem brewing.  With corn futures at $4/bu, many farmers may simply stop rotating crops, keeping the same ground in corn year after year, applying more anhydrous NH3 to maintain "fertility."  Not a good idea; it probably takes corn-to-Ethanol energy-negative aw well. 
        Rate this comment: 12345

        gfschue
        02/26/2007
        Posts:2
        Avg Rating:
        3/5
    • Re: Could this affect the soil fertility
      Grow legumes - they fix nitrogen in the soil, and their root structure loosens the soil. Nothing wrong with peas, beans, and alfalfa as Cellulosic feedstocks. ANYTHING is better than Corn - one of the most soil depleating agricultural crops grown in North America.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      csnyder
      03/14/2007
      Posts:2
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
    • Re: Could this affect the soil fertility
      Agreed.  I am also worried about the effect that removal of straw and stalks from the fields will have on erosion and soil structure. The chopped straw and stems form a protective covering over the fields shielding them from wind and water erosion, holding moisture and are eventually incorporated into the soil where they aid water retension and add bulk to the soil.

      The problem would be much less with perenial plants.  Further, if the waste from alchwere to be returned to the fields either
      Rate this comment: 12345

      jagoudge
      03/19/2007
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
      • Re: Could this affect the soil fertility
        I believe you are all generating much ado over nothing.

        Farmers have always plowed under the harvest "leftovers" and I see no reason to stop them.  (Equipment could be modified to collect the stalks in a seperate truck if we so desire.)

        Instead of hauling our suburban yard waste to the nearest landfill, it could be trucked to a city rail line collection point.  (I've got eight large 60 lbs. bags out front they could have right now.)_It would then be shipped to the regional ethanol plant for conversion.  Switchgrass and other fast growing grasses could be "mined" in the same manner.  We could use our plant waste for energy production and never touch our food stocks.

        Granted Cellulosic ethanol isn't a reality yet.  With research, I believe it will be inside this decade. 

        Yes, I believe every household in the next decade will have a hybrid plug-in on one side of the garage for short trips and a diesel/biodiesel truck or flex fuel car on the other. 

        We will obtain our electricty generated by coal, nuclear, wind, fuel cell, and solar sources.  Solar photovoltaics is making huge strides these days as are fuel cells. 

        Ford motor already has fuel cell vehicles that look like a standard compact sedan, and can run over 200 MPH, but it's going to take some refining before we can own one.  (Did I mention it cost a kings ransom and weighs 6700 Lbs.?)  Yes, solutions are on the way.  Some are close.  Some will take decades.  Cellulosic Ethanol is part, but not all the solution.  Giving the Arabs our hard earned dollars is not a practical option for the next decade.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        CHSReb
        11/25/2007
        Posts:2
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
        • Re: Could this affect the soil fertility
          Growth of switchgrass in the US was primary in the development of the rich soil we now have, so using it for ethanol production would have a positive soil benefit.  I agree with every point you make, but would suggest that medium to large municipalities invest in their own production plants rather than going regional. Citizens yard waste plus the city's waste could supply city needs as well as being a revenue source for the city by selling to the public at a reasonable profit.
          Rate this comment: 12345

          donstrcklnd5
          05/28/2008
          Posts:3
          Avg Rating:
          5/5
        • Re: Could this affect the soil fertility
          Just for the record, we buy more oil from Canada and South American countries than from all the rest of the world combined.  We're not just making the Saudis rich.
          Rate this comment: 12345

          mikew12345
          06/06/2009
          Posts:2
  • A better way to use biomass?
    http://ergosphere.blogspot.com/2006/11/sustainability-energy-independence-and.html


    The problem with ethanol is that it is expensive to transport and store, has poor energy density, but most of all it will get burned at 20-25% efficiency in an internal combustion engine.  Hence the "field" to wheels efficiency is low.

    The above scheme allows biomass to be converted into electricity (some of the syn gas created could be diverted into ethanol production if you wanted to) and charcoal.  This could then be burried and thus sequester carbon from the atmosphere, or it could be converted into more electricity.  This would displace quite a bit of fossil fuel generation.

    Plug in hybrids could utilize this electricity to mitigate much of daily driving.  It would be much easier to create and distribute the lower amount of liquid bio fuels that would then be needed under a PHEV paradigm.

    This would give a much higher "field" to wheels overall efficiency,  streaching that finite resource further. 

    Burrying some of the charcoal by mixing it into soil greatly enhances the ability of the soil to hold on to nutrients etc:

    http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/Feb06/AAAS.terra.preta.ssl.html
    Rate this comment: 12345

    mbmurphy777
    02/26/2007
    Posts:14
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • Enzymes vs Gasification
    Any discussion of cellulosic ethanol should begin with the disticntion of which kind you're talking about.  I think the national discussion is to the point where readers are getting the distinction between corn and cellulosic ethanol, but now comes two forms of cellulosic ethanol with vastly different technologies.

    Gasification cellulosic ethanol, as your own article dated 1/19/07 entitled "Creating Ethanol from Trash" points out, could provide 25% of US gasoline consumption with ethanol created from gasification of Municipal Solid Waste, all for $.05-.95/gallon.

    This technology should be kick-started by DOE.  It is such a sweet answer to so many problems from overfull landfills, groundwater contamination, health issues of many sorts and most importantly(for the ethanol debate), gasoline displacement!

    Enzyme cellulosic ethanol now has many supporters, not the least of which are the 100's of corn ethanol producers who are currently being squeezed by increasing costs of corn!  They will figure it out.  And they need help.  But I hope they don't suck all the oxygen from the fabulous idea of creating ethanol form Municipal Solid Waste as well as other forms of biomass.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    rick2653
    02/26/2007
    Posts:6
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
  • Well managed bio-oil and cellulosic ethanol refineries, green friendly, sulfur free! Time goes on
    There was a time when the horse and buggy manufacturers ignored the horseless carriage!

    Well the Paper Industries are rapidly declining in Canada and the United States. Technologies like e-ink, (electronic paper), will eventually replace paper as we know it.

    There are numerous paper mills being idled that know how to effectively break down trees into fuel stocks that are capable of creating 100 megs. of power a day to power these mills.

    These mills, since they already effectively break down wood chips should be utilized for bio-fuels.

    Take the State of Maine for instance. Maines forests are an incredible self-renewing resource. In 2000 , Maine was as heavily forested as it was in 1600. The forests were nearly cut in half during the mid-1800's but have steadily returned. Today, with 17.8 million acres acres of forested land (approx. 90% of the state). Maine is the most heavily forested state and has been stable for several decades, (double the timber since 1952). This coverage helps shape Maine's image and it's way of life.

    Our forests suffered in the past from mismanagement, but they are now better managed  than ever. That's part of the reason why the forests are replenishing so well. We need to steer some of the Oil Industry Subsidies in D.C. to help seed these new potential industries!

    Well managed bio-oil and cellulosic ethanol refineries, green friendly, sulfur free! Time goes on.

    Cliff Lewis,  choicez@tds.net
    Rate this comment: 12345

    cdlewis
    02/26/2007
    Posts:6
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • Will Cellulosic Ethanol Take off?
    If I were a farmer planning to provide cellulose
    product to industry and the US government,I would consider growing alternative products which could be used for other areas;that is,I would not put all eggs in one basket.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    plasticdoc
    02/26/2007
    Posts:24
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Will Cellulosic Ethanol Take off?
      Sigh, as a scientist with a farming family, I see this debate with a jaundiced eye.
        The soil depletion from using all stubble and stalk is a potential problem, yet still the sludge from the process would be a potentially good fertilizer, as only the hydrocarbons would be taken as fuel--BUT, it takes time and energy to move the processed sludge back to farmland!
        It only takes a minute amount of fixed carbon to create terre verte, but it also takes time.
        Yet, as pointed out, ethanol is a less dense fuel than gas, or if not, why did gasoline triumph over all others? And, like it or not, when the whole damned auto industry started, there were NO GOVERNMENT HELPING HANDS! Expecting real help from bankrupt government authorities--who pay for it by taxing everyone, including the new industries--is like waiting for Godot. He never really comes.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      kitk
      02/27/2007
      Posts:66
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
  • cellulosic METHANOL is a better bet
    Cellulose is very, very hard to degrade by enzymes to glucose, that is why it evolved as the main material of construction in the plant kingdom. If a bug ever is found that can efficiently and quickly break down cellulose, let's hope that it never escapes the laboratory, because that would be a terrifying disaster.
    Then, fermenting glucose to ethanol is done at high dilution (to avoid killing the yeasts doing it) followed by distillation and finally drying the ethanol. This consumes a good bit of energy.
    Cellulose can also be converted by heating into a mixture of CO and H2 (carbohydrates have the formula H2CO); with a further addition of H2 you have methanol. The required technologies are already known; no breakthroughs are required.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    djs
    02/27/2007
    Posts:24
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: cellulosic METHANOL is a better bet
      This sounds really interesting. Burning methanol emits less carbon than burning ethanol. I didn't see any mention of cellulosic methanol in Nobel prize winning author George Olah's book, Beyond Oil and Gas: The Methanol Economy. Maybe he could research and promote your idea.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      bobhargraves
      03/02/2007
      Posts:7
      Avg Rating:
      2/5
      • Re: cellulosic METHANOL is a better bet
           Can  ethanol  and  methanol  be  used  together  as  a  fuel?   I  heard  Richard Branson  say  that  he's  exploring  the  development  of  buthanol  as  a  jet  fuel.   He  said  that  it  works  well  at  the  low  tempertures  in  which  airplanes  fly.  But  he  didn't  offer  any  insight  into  whether  or  not  buthanol  was  related  to  ethanol or  methanol  in  their  manufacure.
            I  also  believe  we  need  to  consider  alternate  fuels  as  a  national  emergency  imperative.   Our  independence  and  sovereignty  are  being  subverted  by  foreign  oil.
          
        Rate this comment: 12345

        Allergg
        03/09/2007
        Posts:1
        Avg Rating:
        3/5
    • Re: cellulosic METHANOL is a better bet
      This bug has already escaped!  It is called a termite....and termites make up the largest biomass of any animal species in the rainforest. 
      Rate this comment: 12345

      risingblue
      03/22/2007
      Posts:4
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
    • Re: cellulosic METHANOL is a better bet
      Unfortunatly, methanol is a poisen that can be absorbed through the skin. Its widspread use will leave many more people suffering. Methanol also degrades and embrittles many plastics used as gaskets and tubing.
      Ethanol does neither of these
      Rate this comment: 12345

      daveorbit2
      03/26/2007
      Posts:2
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
      • Re: cellulosic METHANOL is a better bet
        True, methanol is more corrosive than ethanol, and true it is more toxic than ethanol.  (Like gasoline is a non-toxic fuel?) Ethanol attacks aluminum and natural rubber products. (The use of Viton easily addresses the gasketing issues.)

        Henry Ford ran his Model T on Ethanol.  (It is just our propensity to drink ethanol that has halted it's use as a motor fuel.  I had an associate who ran a Volkswagon Beetle on Ethanol in the early eightys.) It was just this past year that Indy racing switched over to ethanol as a series fuel.


        Probably more is known about methanol as a motor fuel than ethanol.  Methanol has been the fuel of choice for Indy car racing since the mid sixtys, and the National Hot Rod Association has allowed and promoted it's use in multithousand horsepower engines since the mid seventies.
         
        Both fuels should be explored as alternatives to gasoline/diesel fuels.  Ethanol has an edge as to being less toxic, and a higher energy content per gallon.  Methanol, due to its simplier molecular structure, has an edge with producing fewer environmental degrading gasses.

        While the general public may have some concerns, the automotive "Hot Rod" community is eagerly looking forward to the abundent availability of E85.  With a high octane number(100-105), and preliminary tests in performance vehicles showing a 5% increase in power over expensive racing gasolines, it looks like for once the environmentalists and Hot Rodders are on the same side.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        CHSReb
        11/25/2007
        Posts:2
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
    • Re: cellulosic METHANOL is a better bet
      As I understand it, enzymes and bacteria to break down cellulose currently exist in the stomachs of cows, buffalo, and other herbivores. They convert cellulose in grass and shrubs to starches and sugars most efficiently, and without endangering plant life through their excretions; which I'm sure contain these enzymes and bacteria.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      donstrcklnd5
      05/28/2008
      Posts:3
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
  • What if we are negatively affecting our planets ability to regenerate fertile soil this way?
    What if we are negatively affecting our planets ability to regenerate fertile soil this way?

    Can you be sure that we are not?

    D~W
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Draq Wraith
    03/01/2007
    Posts:9
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
  • Cellulosic Feedstock - Alfalfa
    Most of the feedstock mentioned is fertilizer intensive. Fertilizer comes from natural gas. One quarter of our natural gas comes from the volatile Middle East. What we have here is a Catch-22. We have solved nothing. May I suggest that the cellulosic feedstock be a legume? Legumes fix their own nitrogen. Alfalfa would be a better bet than
    any other crop. After processing, the remains can be used for animal fodder and paper making.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    reformer
    03/28/2007
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    • Re: Cellulosic Feedstock - Alfalfa
      Check out switchgrass, a native American plant. Doesn't require fertilizer or excessive water and can be converted into as much as 1500 gallons of ethanol per acre.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      donstrcklnd5
      05/28/2008
      Posts:3
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
    • Re: Cellulosic Feedstock - Alfalfa
      Alfalfa, like corn, is an annual, (requiring annual planting) won't produce well on marginal land, has tons of insect and disease problems, and is difficult (at best) to harvest.  Switchgrass is perennial, native, highly disease and insect resistant, drought tolerant, will produce high yields with minimal fertility...........
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Native Grass...
      06/17/2008
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
  • cellthanol
    If cellthanol one day flys and it helps protect mother earth, I might have to dust off the 78 New Yorker, and put it back out on the road.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    doughboy
    05/07/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
  • !!BREAKTHROUGH!!!
    I think a major breakthrough for the initial processing of the biomass for the breakdown of cellulose has been made using a Carabao rumen at the Philippine Carabao Center. As you all know the major challenge in producing cellulosic ethanol that sometimes makes it impractical to mass produce is the difficulty in breaking down the cellulose to simple sugar for fermentation. Previously, researchers has been using cow's rumen to break it down with some success, but still unable to process the lignin part. The Philippines reseachers was able to use the Carabao rumen to break it down with a resounding success of epic proportion. Read more at: http://fiorelloabenes.com/PCIERD.aspx  
    Rate this comment: 12345

    boya
    06/22/2008
    Posts:2
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
  • Ceetol is the future no doubt about it
    Several countries are working on enzyme technology in a race to be the leader in Ceetol (cellulosic ethanol) production. New technologies are popping up on a global scale. Remember America is not the only country suffering from an oil crisis. New enzyme technology methods are exploding world wide in Ireland, England, Denmark, Germany, France, Australia, Phillippines, Japan, China, to name but a few. From all the U.S. based articles I have read Novozymes seems to be leading the enzyme technology here, but on a global stage they are not alone by any means. Energy policy is at the forefront of every debate in almost every country right now. This is truely a 'race to the moon' but with a lot more countries involved.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    CeEth Head
    06/30/2008
    Posts:1
  • drink it too?
    The best thing about this ceethol is we can drink it too. Can we? Toast!
    Rate this comment: 12345

    boya
    07/04/2008
    Posts:2
    Avg Rating:
    5/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Malleable Maps, Artistic Robots and Bubble Interfaces
Technology Review January/February 2010

Current Issue

Security in the Ether
Information technology's next grand challenge will be to secure the cloud--and prove we can trust it.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.