In the face of this complexity, many have decided to focus their research efforts on cutting the cost of traditional "flat-plate" systems. This is done through making them thinner, to decrease the amount of semiconductor needed, or through turning to cheaper, though less efficient, organic materials. But now several companies claim to have developed reliable systems that can be manufactured on a large scale. For example, SolFocus is making a system that combines the concentrators and cells in one sealed package by employing manufacturing techniques similar to those used to make automobile headlamps. This way they can easily be created in large quantities, according to the company's CEO, Gary Conley.
As for the use of superefficient solar cells, critics originally said that although the cells worked well in the lab, it would be unlikely that their high efficiencies could be maintained in large-scale manufacturing. Unlike conventional solar cells, which use only one type of semiconductor (silicon), these more efficient cells, called multijunction cells, are made from layers of three types of semiconductor. This approach is meant to overcome a major limitation of silicon: although it can absorb photons from most of the spectrum in sunlight, it does so inefficiently, converting into heat, rather than into electricity, most of the energy in high-energy photons from the blue and ultraviolet parts of the spectrum. The multijunction cells use three materials designed to efficiently convert light from different parts of the spectrum, the result being that much less is converted into heat and much more into electricity.
All of the materials must be carefully engineered to work with the other materials, and they have to be assembled under very clean, well-controlled conditions. So in the 1990s, when this type of cell was still experimental, people called it "a laboratory curiosity that could never be manufactured in large volume," Olson says. "Now Spectrolab on their production floor does better than we do in the lab. So it basically blew that myth out of the water."
Other factors that have limited the use of concentrated solar, such as aesthetic objections to mounting concentrator systems on suburban rooftops, may largely restrict applications to commercial buildings or arrays in the desert.
But the advances that have come about, along with growing demand for solar and a shortage of silicon feedstock, have made concentrated solar photovoltaics attractive.
"There's a lot of uncertainty in this area, where historically there's been a lot of hype that just hasn't been delivered," Rogol says. "The biggest news for me is that serious solar people, over the course of the last year, have made notable commitments to concentrators."
Comments
gfschue on 11/09/2006 at 8:58 AM
2
zeddy on 11/09/2006 at 10:58 PM
4
http://www.earthscan.co.uk/news/article/mps/UAN/486/v/3/sp/332958698966342800322
Up to 39% efficiency is currently quoted, which is starting to become viable if it can be cheaply and reliably mass produced. Compare this with the efficiency of an (average) coal-fired power station: http://www.aie.org.au/melb/material/resource/pwr-eff.htm
While multi-junction cells have greater coverage of the sunlight/IR spectrum, there are possibilities for shifting the wavelengths using special materials: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-10/m-abf101306.php
MarkShapiro on 11/09/2006 at 1:25 PM
13
For a large, industrial scale plant it would not be of much use, but on a commerical or residential building it could heat potable water or be used for HVAC.
But I like this even as is.
bfskinner59 on 11/11/2006 at 4:10 AM
1
SCOTT on 11/12/2006 at 10:42 AM
1
scott712 on 02/03/2007 at 8:11 PM
2
dan_white on 11/09/2006 at 3:03 PM
1
appear that could say, on 15 sunny days / month in summer generate 1000 kw * hours of power.
of course for a price that will yeild returns in years not decades.
saforu on 02/24/2007 at 9:26 AM
3
Draq Wraith on 11/09/2006 at 4:20 PM
8
D~W
getinfo on 11/09/2006 at 6:11 PM
1
http://pointfocus.com
http://www.stirlingenergy.com
What's available is simply not public knowledge yet.
phoenix on 11/09/2006 at 10:27 PM
100
zippo on 04/05/2007 at 2:34 PM
24
rags_3093 on 12/26/2006 at 8:56 AM
1
johnthermax on 01/23/2007 at 1:13 PM
1
rbkoganti on 02/12/2007 at 6:43 AM
1
saforu on 02/24/2007 at 9:24 AM
3
saforu on 02/24/2007 at 9:52 AM
3
iwit on 01/02/2007 at 10:07 AM
1
For a listing and description of 11 of his patents dealing with high power solar cells, please see the NASA Glenn Center site - Solar Cell Patents: <http://timeline.grc.nasa.gov/index.cfm?fuseaction=GENSEARCH.results&keywords=John+C.+Evans&x=24&y=12>
I would very much like to see that my father, Dr. John C. Evans receives the recognition that he deserves for being a pioneer in the field of High Energy Solar Cells. Best regards, Karyn Tegtmeier
aperkins on 01/09/2007 at 9:28 AM
1
jtholmes on 01/27/2007 at 12:44 PM
1
nate_fast on 02/02/2007 at 2:44 PM
1
-Nathan
Electrical Engineering Student
te26504164 on 03/13/2007 at 9:52 AM
3
uspto.gov
Solar John on 04/03/2007 at 2:29 PM
12
John