|
Thursday, November 09, 2006 Cheap, Superefficient SolarSolar-power modules that concentrate the power of the sun are becoming more viable. By Kevin Bullis
Technologies collectively known as concentrating photovoltaics are starting to enjoy their day in the sun, thanks to advances in solar cells, which absorb light and convert it into electricity, and the mirror- or lens-based concentrator systems that focus light on them. The technology could soon make solar power as cheap as electricity from the grid. The idea of concentrating sunlight to reduce the size of solar cells--and therefore to cut costs--has been around for decades. But interest in the technology has picked up in the past year. Last month, Japanese electronics giant Sharp Corporation showed off its new system for focusing sunlight with a fresnel lens (like the one used in lighthouses) onto superefficient solar cells, which are about twice as efficient as conventional silicon cells. Other companies, such as SolFocus, based in Palo Alto, CA, and Energy Innovations, based in Pasadena, CA, are rolling out new concentrators. And the company that supplied the long-lived photovoltaic cells for the Mars rovers, Boeing subsidiary Spectrolab, based in Sylmar, CA, is supplying more than a million cells for concentrator projects, including one in Australia that will generate enough power for 3,500 homes. The thinking behind concentrated solar power is simple. Because energy from the sun, although abundant, is diffuse, generating one gigawatt of power (the size of a typical utility-scale plant) using traditional photovoltaics requires a four-square-mile area of silicon, says Jerry Olson, a research scientist at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, in Golden, CO. A concentrator system, he says, would replace most of the silicon with plastic or glass lenses or metal reflectors, requiring only as much semiconductor material as it would take to cover an area the size of a typical backyard. And because decreasing the amount of semiconductor needed makes it affordable to use much more efficient types of solar cells, the total footprint of the plant, including the reflectors or lenses, would be only two to two-and-a-half square miles. (This approach is distinct from concentrated thermal solar power, which concentrates the heat from the sun to power turbines or sterling engines.) "I'd much rather make a few square miles of plastic lenses--it would cost me less--than a few square miles of silicon solar cells," Olson says. Today solar power is still more expensive than electricity from the grid, but concentrator technology has the potential to change this. Indeed, if manufacturers can meet the challenges of ramping up production and selling, distributing, and installing the systems, their prices could easily meet prices for electricity from the grid, says solar-industry analyst Michael Rogol, managing director of Photon Consulting, in Aachen, Germany. But the approach has been difficult to implement. "It has not delivered on the promise, mostly because of the complexity of the systems," Rogol says. The goal is to engineer a concentrating system that focuses sunlight, that tracks the movement of the sun to keep the light on the small solar cell, and that can accommodate the high heat caused by concentrating the sun's power by 500 to700 times--and to make such a system easy to manufacture.
|
A Better Solar Collector
07/10/2008



Comments
gfschue on 11/09/2006 at 8:58 AM
2
zeddy on 11/09/2006 at 10:58 PM
4
http://www.earthscan.co.uk/news/article/mps/UAN/486/v/3/sp/332958698966342800322
Up to 39% efficiency is currently quoted, which is starting to become viable if it can be cheaply and reliably mass produced. Compare this with the efficiency of an (average) coal-fired power station: http://www.aie.org.au/melb/material/resource/pwr-eff.htm
While multi-junction cells have greater coverage of the sunlight/IR spectrum, there are possibilities for shifting the wavelengths using special materials: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-10/m-abf101306.php
MarkShapiro on 11/09/2006 at 1:25 PM
13
For a large, industrial scale plant it would not be of much use, but on a commerical or residential building it could heat potable water or be used for HVAC.
But I like this even as is.
bfskinner59 on 11/11/2006 at 4:10 AM
1
SCOTT on 11/12/2006 at 10:42 AM
1
scott712 on 02/03/2007 at 8:11 PM
2
dan_white on 11/09/2006 at 3:03 PM
1
appear that could say, on 15 sunny days / month in summer generate 1000 kw * hours of power.
of course for a price that will yeild returns in years not decades.
saforu on 02/24/2007 at 9:26 AM
3
Draq Wraith on 11/09/2006 at 4:20 PM
8
D~W
getinfo on 11/09/2006 at 6:11 PM
1
http://pointfocus.com
http://www.stirlingenergy.com
What's available is simply not public knowledge yet.
phoenix on 11/09/2006 at 10:27 PM
82
zippo on 04/05/2007 at 2:34 PM
24
rags_3093 on 12/26/2006 at 8:56 AM
1
johnthermax on 01/23/2007 at 1:13 PM
1
rbkoganti on 02/12/2007 at 6:43 AM
1
saforu on 02/24/2007 at 9:24 AM
3
saforu on 02/24/2007 at 9:52 AM
3
iwit on 01/02/2007 at 10:07 AM
1
For a listing and description of 11 of his patents dealing with high power solar cells, please see the NASA Glenn Center site - Solar Cell Patents: <http://timeline.grc.nasa.gov/index.cfm?fuseaction=GENSEARCH.results&keywords=John+C.+Evans&x=24&y=12>
I would very much like to see that my father, Dr. John C. Evans receives the recognition that he deserves for being a pioneer in the field of High Energy Solar Cells. Best regards, Karyn Tegtmeier
aperkins on 01/09/2007 at 9:28 AM
1
jtholmes on 01/27/2007 at 12:44 PM
1
nate_fast on 02/02/2007 at 2:44 PM
1
-Nathan
Electrical Engineering Student
te26504164 on 03/13/2007 at 9:52 AM
3
uspto.gov
Solar John on 04/03/2007 at 2:29 PM
12
John