Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement
« Back 1 2 [3]

March/April 2008

Android Calling

Continued from page 2

By Simson Garfinkel

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

What's Next
Android is not the "Google phone" that rumor suggested before the software was launched. Indeed, the company doesn't really want to own your phone. It just wants to be sure that no other company does. If Android succeeds, it will keep the wireless world safe for Google and whatever services it might seek to offer in the future. Today there are a billion Internet users but nearly three billion people with mobile phones. That's a lot of eyeballs, and Google is first and foremost an advertising firm. And so it is not surprising that Google may do more than build a new operating system in its effort to entrench itself in the wireless world. At press time, the company was in the process of bidding for wireless-­spectrum licenses being auctioned by the Federal Communications Commission.

If Android succeeds, it will have a major impact on wireless carriers. A phone running Google's component-based operating system, after all, would treat wireless operators like Verizon and AT&T as just another way to reach data services on the Internet. Such a phone could turn today's wireless providers into commodity data communications networks that also happen to carry voice. This would force the providers to compete in every area--network quality, handset quality, and price--without allowing good performance in one area to lock customers in and support ­mediocre performance in another. T-Mobile (an OHA member) already gets it: some of its newest phones allow calls over either T‑Mobile's GSM network or Wi-Fi. I think this change will happen even without the Google phone. I'm seeing more unlocked phones with Wi-Fi capability from companies like Nokia (not an OHA member); just drop in an AT&T SIM card and they'll play on AT&T's network. But though the change may happen anyway, Google is pushing it along at a faster clip.

Just as Google's place in the wireless world is a work in progress, so too is Android, which I suspect will not be limited to cell phones. If it's successful, we're likely to see Android as the basis of other handheld devices: digital cameras, GPS receivers, or even lightweight tablet computers. If Android really works, it's going to change the face of mobile computing.

Simson Garfinkel is an associate professor of computer science at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, CA, and a contributing editor at Technology Review.

« Back 1 2 [3]
March/April 2008

Would you like to read more articles from the March/April 2008 issue?

This article is from the March/April 2008 Issue of Technology Review. To read other articles from this issue simply register for My.TechnologyReview.com. It's free.

Subscribe today and save up to 41% »

Resources

Events

Comments

  • dont trust the large cellco's
    Sjobeck on 02/28/2008 at 11:48 AM
    Posts:
    17
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    I dont trust the large cellco's as far as I can throw their enormous palatial headquarters buildings. Theyll do everything in their power to ruin this, stop this, prevent this, sue people, then when all that is passed and it is slowly but surely starting to work, then theyll intentionally introduce delays in their network so that we cant do Skype or VoIP calls. They are greedy, self-interested, self-important, all-knowing, dinosaurs, who have purchased enough Representatives & Senators to let their in-house counsel write the legislation & then have them submit it.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: dont trust the large cellco's
      mlnease on 02/28/2008 at 2:39 PM
      Posts:
      1
      Great article, Simson, thanks--I certainly agree with everything Sjobeck wrote and would add that, given the spectacularly fraudlent and larcenous history of U.S. telecoms and the willingness of the federal government to aid and abet them, bail them out, retroactively immunize them and so on, Google and the OHA certainly have their work cut out for them.  More power to them.
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • Advertising
    TimG on 02/29/2008 at 12:45 PM
    Posts:
    8
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    Just a thought; will Brent Spiner be doing ads for new 'Android'-based phones?  ;-)
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • phone makers
    Jeff on 03/02/2008 at 5:08 AM
    Posts:
    3
    If the software is so good, why aren't phone makers adopting it? The problem for phones has always been that their limited processing power requires small and efficient software programs, which is exactly what most open software is not. Just my 2 cents.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • OnStar
    jmaximus9 on 03/06/2008 at 9:44 AM
    Posts:
    47
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    OnStar uses networks through out North America, but they pay a heavy premium to do so. I can't imagine these greedy companies allowing somebody else using their network without doing the same thing. Wireless should be cheaper than land line, those wires need lots maintenance [rust, squirrel chew, falling trees, construction crews digging up lines, etc], wireless only has their towers which need way less work.
    Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review January/February 2009
Lifeline for Renewable Power
Without a radically expanded and smarter electrical grid, wind and solar will remain niche power sources.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today
Advertisement

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology