Technology Review - Published By MIT
Log in to My.TechnologyReview.com | Register
Advertisement
[1] 2 3 Next »

March/April 2008

Android Calling

Does Google want to free your phone--or does it want to own it?

By Simson Garfinkel

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon
Credit: Tavis Coburn
ANDROID SOFTWARE DEVELOPER KIT VERSION M3-RC37A
Cost: Free

Last November, Google and 33 other companies announced the Open Handset Alliance (OHA), a new industry consortium that, in promoting open standards for mobile devices, promises to reinvent the cell phone--and possibly the entire wireless-­telecommunications industry. While that's a tall order, I suspect that handsets, which Google intends to make as customizable as laptop computers, are just the beginning of the company's mobile efforts.

The word "open" in OHA's name is not just a buzzword: it signifies a radical ­departure from today's cellular networks, especially those in the United States. Today's cellular ecologies aren't exactly closed; it's possible to load third-party applications onto some cell phones, and websites belonging to third-party providers such as Google can be accessed. Verizon (not an OHA member) has even announced its willingness to open its network to non-Verizon phones. But that openness is all at the periphery: wireless providers today offer just enough choice in phones, features, and services to remain competitive while preventing consumers from using rival tech­nology and defecting to other carriers.

Indeed, companies like Verizon and AT&T (also not an OHA member) operate vertically integrated telecommunication ecologies of stores, resellers, content providers, and network services--all with the goal of extracting as much revenue as possible from a customer base that's kept captive with multiuser contracts, exclusive hardware offerings, and free in-network calling. The wireless industry's favorite metric is "average revenue per user."

This approach--using integrated services to extract maximum revenue--will slowly evaporate if OHA is successful. And the key to that success will be Android, a new software "stack" for mobile phones that's based on open-source software and a revolutionary programming paradigm.

Android is called a "stack" because its software extends from the lowest levels controlling the phone's hardware to the highest levels of user interaction. At the bottom is a stripped-down version of the Linux kernel (the heart of the Linux operating system). On top of the kernel is the open-source WebKit Web browser (also used by Apple's iPhone) and several other open-source programs. On top of this are user applications that are beautiful but, at least in the developer's preview version, primitive and buggy. Once Google finishes this release, Android is going to look as pretty as the iPhone--and it will be just as functional, if not more so.

The first thing to point out is that you can't run Android on a phone that you might have today. Instead, manufacturers like HTC, LG, Samsung, and Motorola (all OHA members) will need to adapt it to future handsets. If the consortium has its way, these phones will be available in stores in the second half of 2008. You'll also be able to buy an Android-based phone over the Internet and drop in a chip from the cell phone that's in your pocket today, assuming you have a cell phone from T-Mobile, AT&T, or another provider that uses the GSM transmission standard.

Android's developers envision a world where today's integrated wireless systems are reduced to a set of relationships between parts that are more or less interchangeable. Consumers will be free to load their phones with applications of their own choosing--free applications, applications available for sale, and custom applications developed by enterprises for their employees. These applications will be able to communicate with third-party services offered over the Internet--using any available communications pipe, be it the cellular network, a nearby Wi-Fi connection, or even a Bluetooth connection from another phone.

[1] 2 3 Next »
March/April

Would you like to read more articles from the March/April issue?

This article is from the March/April Issue of Technology Review. To read other articles from this issue simply register for My.TechnologyReview.com. It's free.

Subscribe today and save up to 41% »

Comments

  • dont trust the large cellco's
    Sjobeck on 02/28/2008 at 11:48 AM
    Posts:
    16
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    I dont trust the large cellco's as far as I can throw their enormous palatial headquarters buildings. Theyll do everything in their power to ruin this, stop this, prevent this, sue people, then when all that is passed and it is slowly but surely starting to work, then theyll intentionally introduce delays in their network so that we cant do Skype or VoIP calls. They are greedy, self-interested, self-important, all-knowing, dinosaurs, who have purchased enough Representatives & Senators to let their in-house counsel write the legislation & then have them submit it.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: dont trust the large cellco's
      mlnease on 02/28/2008 at 2:39 PM
      Posts:
      1
      Great article, Simson, thanks--I certainly agree with everything Sjobeck wrote and would add that, given the spectacularly fraudlent and larcenous history of U.S. telecoms and the willingness of the federal government to aid and abet them, bail them out, retroactively immunize them and so on, Google and the OHA certainly have their work cut out for them.  More power to them.
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • Advertising
    TimG on 02/29/2008 at 12:45 PM
    Posts:
    8
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    Just a thought; will Brent Spiner be doing ads for new 'Android'-based phones?  ;-)
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • phone makers
    Jeff on 03/02/2008 at 5:08 AM
    Posts:
    3
    If the software is so good, why aren't phone makers adopting it? The problem for phones has always been that their limited processing power requires small and efficient software programs, which is exactly what most open software is not. Just my 2 cents.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • OnStar
    jmaximus9 on 03/06/2008 at 9:44 AM
    Posts:
    34
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    OnStar uses networks through out North America, but they pay a heavy premium to do so. I can't imagine these greedy companies allowing somebody else using their network without doing the same thing. Wireless should be cheaper than land line, those wires need lots maintenance [rust, squirrel chew, falling trees, construction crews digging up lines, etc], wireless only has their towers which need way less work.
    Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review September/October 2008
How Obama Really Did It
Social technology helped bring him to the brink of the presidency.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology